Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Giriraj Singh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for de-sealing his property used for non-polluting activities, with inspection and assessment of misuse charges as per law.
Jagbir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under NGT orders for polluting activities, subject to an undertaking and assessment of misuse charges based on actual use.
Brahmjeet Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for de-sealing a property sealed under an NGT order, with procedural safeguards and assessment of misuse charges only after inspection.
Dheeraj Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under an NGT order against polluting activities, subject to procedural safeguards and assessment of misuse charges.
Ajit Singh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed procedural compliance for de-sealing a property sealed under an NGT order, emphasizing permissible use and assessment of misuse charges by the municipal authority.
Giriraj Singh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under an NGT order for polluting activities, subject to an undertaking and assessment of misuse charges based on permissible use under the Master Plan of Delhi 2021.
Umesh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under an NGT order for polluting activities, subject to an undertaking and assessment of misuser charges by the MCD.
Braham Prakash v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the DDA can act against unauthorized construction under the DD Act without deciding ownership disputes, which must be resolved by civil courts, and directed the DDA to provide owners a hearing before demolition.
Pravin Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions where petitioners contradicted their earlier admissions regarding appointment pursuant to a 1987 recruitment advertisement promising pensionary benefits.
Union of India v. Ex Sgt Abhaya Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman suffering from PIVD aggravated by military service, affirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction and the presumption favoring armed forces personnel in disability claims.
Union of India & Ors. v. 773702-H Sgt Bhanu Pratap Yadav (Retd)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming that the disease is presumed service-connected absent proof to the contrary and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law only.
Dilwar Singh Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to decide the petitioners' pending representations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks, disposing of the writ petitions accordingly.
Gaurav Aggarwal v. Richa Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of arbitration proceedings on the ground that an unregistered and unstamped Agreement to Sell sub-leasehold rights in immovable property is unenforceable under the Registration Act and Transfer of Property Act.
M/S Sopan Restaurant v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a seven-month extension of the catering stall license at Kanpur Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction over Indian Railways policy challenges and following precedent on license extensions.
National Highway Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd v. NSPR VKJ JV & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking termination of the Presiding Arbitrator's mandate on unsubstantiated corruption allegations, holding that only legal disqualifications under the Seventh Schedule justify removal under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Hari Om alias Hari Om Gupta v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a major adult woman who expressed her unwillingness to return to her husband, affirming her right to personal liberty and choice of residence.
GM Modular Pvt Ltd v. Mudit Kumar Chaturvedi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil appeal as withdrawn at the appellant's request without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Ajay Sharma v. The State N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Ajay Sharma in a murder case, holding that CDR evidence is corroborative and cannot solely sustain conviction, and considering the prolonged trial and petitioner’s circumstances.
State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Ajay Kumar Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to lack of documentary proof of victim's minority and medical evidence, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to establish essential elements beyond reasonable doubt.
Amit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a CRPF constable for furnishing a bogus matriculation certificate at recruitment, rejecting his claim of bona fide mistake and affirming the mandatory nature of dismissal in such cases.