Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Onkar Dattatray Kalmankar v. Public Information Officer
The Bombay High Court held that marks obtained by candidates in a public recruitment process are not exempt from disclosure under RTI and ordered disclosure of all candidates' marks to promote transparency and public confidence.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Subhash Mahadev Desai
The Bombay High Court set aside the Labour Court's award reinstating a dismissed employee due to a 13-year delay in raising the industrial dispute, holding that unreasonable delay and laches are fatal to such claims under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Sharekhan Limited v. Monita Kisan Khade & Ors.
Bombay High Court held that failure to maintain SEBI-mandated pre-trade confirmations does not automatically entitle clients to recover losses from stockbrokers, setting aside arbitral awards that awarded damages without proof of actual loss.
The Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operative Bank v. Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a civil suit challenging SARFAESI Act auction proceedings is barred under Section 34 unless fraud is specifically pleaded, restoring the Trial Court's order rejecting the plaint.
BOSCH LIMITED v. BOSCH EMPLOYEES UNION
The Bombay High Court modified a Labour Court award reinstating dismissed workers by directing lump sum compensation in lieu of reinstatement due to proved misconduct balanced against victimisation and long delay.
Shyamalendu Kumar Das v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld interception orders under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act in a corruption case, holding that succinct reasons recording public safety and necessity suffice and that such orders are judicially reviewable but entitled to deference.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. CA Gordhanbhai Madhabhai Savalia
The Bombay High Court dismissed the Institute's disciplinary reference against a Chartered Accountant due to inordinate delay, lack of independent findings, and acquittal in criminal trial, emphasizing the need for expeditious and reasoned proceedings.
Akhilesh Rawat & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging JNU's policy on Ph.D. supervision by permitting the co-supervisor to take over after the original supervisor's retirement without ruling on the policy's validity.
Akhilesh Rawat & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Prof. Rajeev Kumar's application to recall the disposal order and re-enter a writ petition after he was deleted as a party and did not challenge that deletion, holding he lacked locus standi as the final order did not affect his rights.
Harshit Harish Jain & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the limitation period for refund of stamp duty runs from the date of registration of the cancellation deed, applying the amended Stamp Act provisions, and dismissed the petition challenging the refund rejection.
Subhash Pandurang Bandiwadekar v. The State of Maharashtra
Rejection of Change Reports does not automatically invalidate membership unless specifically adjudicated, and Election Officer cannot exclude members from election voters list without proper enquiry into membership validity.
Desai Hospitals Ventures LLP & Anr v. DHI Global Holdings Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed Plaintiffs' interim injunction against termination of a franchise agreement, holding that fraudulent underreporting of sales justified termination and precluded specific performance.
Jayashree Chandrakant Dhavre v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court directed payment of the final reward to the legal heir of a deceased informer, holding that belated doubts about identity cannot justify arbitrary withholding of rewards already partially disbursed.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Ananya Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, rejecting a one-sided arbitration clause and referring disputes under a loan agreement to arbitration.
Satara District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside the order cancelling recruitment of 385 cooperative bank employees, holding that cancellation without hearing appointees and without concrete proof of irregularity violates natural justice and is unsustainable after six years of service.
B.V. Jewels v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the statutory interest demand and sealing of factory premises, holding the petitioner failed to comply fully with the Supreme Court's order and the interest liability arises automatically under the Customs Act.
Usha Kakade v. Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd.
Appeals against orders in enforcement proceedings under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are not maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act or CPC, and the maintainability issue is conclusively settled by res judicata.
Shiv Developers v. Aksharay Developers
The Supreme Court held that Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act bars suits by unregistered firms only when enforcing contractual rights arising from business dealings, and does not bar suits enforcing statutory or common law rights including those based on fraud.
Hiraman Yashwant Kathe & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that disputes over compensation fixed by agreement under Section 33(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act cannot be referred under Section 34, and the 2013 Act applies only to compensation determined unilaterally by the Collector.
Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court directed Maharashtra to comply with Supreme Court mandates and statutory obligations under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, ensuring effective child protection through proper staffing, functioning, and monitoring of all related authorities and institutions.