Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mohammed Zain Khan v. Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority
The Bombay High Court held that complaints under Section 31 of RERA are maintainable only for projects liable to registration, dismissing the appellant's claim against an unregistered agricultural land project not capable of registration.
M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Abhishek Anuj Sukhadia and Mrs. Chaya Anuj Sukhadia
The Bombay High Court upheld MahaRERA's order directing the promoter to pay interest from the original possession date under the sale agreement, rejecting the promoter's claim that the revised project completion date or COVID-19 moratorium exempted it from liability.
Manvi Hakka Sanrakshan and Jagruti v. Charity Commissioner of Maharashtra and Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a Charity Commissioner circular directing trusts to remove phrases like 'corruption eradication' and 'human rights' from their names, holding such objectives fall within charitable purposes under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the circular lacked statutory authority.
Subrat Kumar Sahoo v. Mumbai University and College Tribunal & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld reinstatement after wrongful termination without enquiry, allowed fresh enquiry with subsistence allowance during enquiry period, and set aside denial of backwages pending enquiry.
Dhondu Sakharam Tambe & Rupali Dhondu Tambe v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court allowed compensation to the parents of a deceased train passenger based on circumstantial evidence and established bonafide passenger status despite non-reporting of the incident to railway officials.
Chogalal Santokhji Raval v. Sjamkarprasad Jagnath Varma
The Court held that possession after expiry of a license does not confer protected tenant status under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act and upheld the decree for recovery of possession in favor of the Plaintiff.
Shashvat Nakrani v. Ashneer Grover
The Delhi High Court held that the transfer of shares was valid and effective despite alleged non-payment of consideration, dismissing the plaintiff's claim to rescind the agreement and granting no interim injunction.
Blossom Industries Limited v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST show cause notice on production overhead charges and misclassification, holding that statutory remedies must be exhausted and the notice was not without jurisdiction.
KSL & Industries Ltd v. Patheja Forgings & Auto Parts Manufacturing Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that winding-up proceedings must be transferred to the NCLT under Section 434(1)(c) unless the company has reached irreversible corporate death, enabling resolution under the IBC.
Gayatri Construction v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld a unilateral deemed conveyance order granting land ownership to a cooperative housing society under MOFA, rejecting the petitioner's challenge based on prior lease agreements and procedural grounds.
Surya Corporation and anr. v. The Competent Authority and ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a Competent Authority cannot materially alter a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance by issuing a Corrigendum without jurisdiction, notice, or reasons, and set aside such Corrigendum and consequent conveyance deed.
Yogesh Jayant Khadilkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority's grant of deemed conveyance to a Co-operative Housing Society despite absence of occupancy certificate, affirming that promoter default cannot bar conveyance under Section 11 MOFA.
Laxman Narayan Zagade and Ors. v. Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority's grant of unilateral deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA to a cooperative housing society despite unauthorized construction and absence of occupation certificate, emphasizing the promoter's default cannot bar the society's statutory rights.
Laxman Narayan Zagade and Ors. v. Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority's power under Section 11 of MOFA to grant unilateral deemed conveyance to a cooperative housing society despite absence of occupation certificate and unauthorized construction, rejecting landowners' challenge.
ACME Enterprises & Anr. v. Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies (2) & Ors.
The court held that unilateral deemed conveyance under MOFA vests title by summary order but does not conclusively decide title disputes, which must be adjudicated in civil suits to determine land entitlement and construction rights between Developer and Federation.
Shivani Vig Kapoor and Rushi Tiwari Makker v. Registrar of Trademarks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of the trademark "WONDERFUL WORLD", holding it to be suggestive and registrable, and emphasized the need for reasoned refusal orders.
Ganesh Arjun Chukkal v. Melronia Hospitality Private Limited
The Court upheld eviction of licensee Brice and dismissed claims of personal leasehold rights by its director based on a dubious unregistered lease deed, affirming that possession secured by license must be surrendered upon expiry.
R K Associates and Hoteliers Pvt Ltd v. BW Businessworld Media Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed reference of disputes to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the respondent's contention regarding a subsequent agreement.
Rafique Rahemtullah Kabani v. The Assistant Engineer & Designated Officer
The Bombay High Court upheld the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation's demolition notice against unauthorized constructions from the 2nd to 8th floors, rejecting natural justice and regularisation claims and dismissing the writ petition with costs.
Yashoda Hospital and Research Center Limited v. Yashoda Super Specialty Hospital and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte IPAB order removing a trademark for failure to effect due service and violation of natural justice, ordering a fresh hearing.