Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ramesh Kymal v. M/s Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Pvt Ltd
The Supreme Court held that Section 10A of the IBC bars initiation of insolvency proceedings for defaults occurring on or after 25 March 2020, even if the application was filed before the provision's insertion, dismissing the appellant's Section 9 application.
Ramesh Kymal v. M/s Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Pvt Ltd
The Supreme Court held that Section 10A of the IBC bars initiation of insolvency proceedings for defaults occurring on or after 25 March 2020, even if the application was filed before the provision's insertion, and dismissed the appeal challenging this bar.
Laxmibai Chandaragi B v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court quashed a missing person FIR and upheld the right of two consenting adults to marry without family consent, condemning police coercion and directing sensitization for handling inter-caste marriage cases.
Boloram Bordoloi v. Lakhimi Gaolia Bank & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld compulsory retirement imposed on a bank manager after departmental enquiry, affirming the procedure and proportionality of punishment while directing payment of retiral benefits.
Boloram Bordoloi v. Lakhimi Gaolia Bank & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld compulsory retirement of a bank manager for grave misconduct, confirming procedural compliance in disciplinary proceedings and ordering payment of retiral benefits.
5d8cc7d9c8aa450286984bfe2d3b45344b8407a7fdf2adbef0d42a7632c8e601
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction in a sexual assault case, affirming that credible victim testimony corroborated by medical evidence suffices for conviction despite minor inconsistencies.
a4d993cd483fa8d2b8fa3006146cf040a60876d49d08ef83e00f6802646601b5
The court upheld the conviction of the accused for causing grievous injuries, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through medical and circumstantial evidence.
A. Subramanian & Anr v. R. Pannerselvam
The Supreme Court upheld the grant of permanent injunction based on admitted possession despite disputed title, affirming that possession is protectable against all except the true owner, especially where defendants failed in prior litigation.
Harshit Agarwal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Central Government's refusal to lower the minimum qualifying percentile for BDS admission in 2020-2021 without proper consultation and ignoring vital facts was illegal and irrational, directing a 10 percentile reduction to fill vacant seats.
Harshit Agarwal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Central Government's refusal to lower the minimum qualifying percentile for BDS admission in 2020-2021 was illegal and irrational, directing a reduction in cut-off marks to fill vacant seats.
Sumedha Sushil Sawal v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the refusal of approval to a teacher's appointment made after the Education Department failed to respond timely to the management's request, affirming that managements may proceed with recruitment following due procedure in such circumstances.
Neelam Manmohan Attavar v. Manmohan Attavar
The Supreme Court dismissed a second application seeking recall of an earlier order and rejected a recusal plea, holding that repetitive applications and baseless recusal requests are not maintainable.
Joginder and another v. State of Haryana and others
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of petitioners' claim for regularization of Panchayat land under Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules, holding that illegal occupation exceeding 200 square yards disqualifies entitlement to regularization.
Joginder and another v. State of Haryana and others
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of petitioners' application for regularization of Panchayat land under Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules, holding that illegal occupation exceeding 200 square yards cannot be regularized.
Gajanan Babulal Bansode & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the Maharashtra Government's unilateral appointment of additional Police Sub-Inspectors beyond notified vacancies without MPSC consultation violated recruitment rules and constitutional principles, and stayed the appointments pending tribunal adjudication.
Gajanan Babulal Bansode & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Supreme Court stayed the Maharashtra Government's appointment of additional Police Sub-Inspectors beyond notified vacancies without MPSC consultation, holding it violates recruitment rules and constitutional equality.
U.P. HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR v. NAMIT SHARMA
The Supreme Court held that invalidated and unrenewed housing registrations do not confer any right to allotment, setting aside the High Court's direction to allot a plot to the respondent.
U.P. HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR v. NAMIT SHARMA
The Supreme Court held that invalidated registration does not confer right to housing allotment and set aside the High Court's direction to allot a plot to the respondent.
Vishwas Bhandari v. State of Punjab & Anr.
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant due to absence of any allegation or evidence implicating him, holding that continuation of such proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Vishwas Bhandari v. State of Punjab & Anr.
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant due to absence of any allegation or evidence implicating him, holding continuation of proceedings an abuse of process of law.