Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mumtaz H. Khoja v. The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the review petition seeking rehabilitation tenement allotment due to suppression of material facts and misrepresentation by the petitioner, emphasizing the duty of full disclosure under Article 226 and ordering contempt proceedings and inquiries into unauthorized school operations.
Sarwan Kumar Jhabarmal Choudhary v. Sachin Shyamsundar Begrajka
The Bombay High Court held that the explanations to Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, are illustrative and not exhaustive, allowing courts discretion to revoke probate on "just cause" beyond the enumerated grounds.
Vilas Babanrao Kalokhe v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Pune & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed prosecution under Section 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, holding that mere delay in payment of self-assessment tax without willful evasion does not attract penal prosecution.
Ashok Shreekrishna Beharay v. The Joint Charity Commissioner
The High Court held that a person removed from a public trust’s membership does not qualify as a 'person having interest' to intervene in loan sanction proceedings under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, and dismissed the petition seeking such intervention.
Kum. Ratna Ramesh Salunke & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Education Department's rejection of teacher appointments made without using the mandated Pavitra Portal, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory recruitment procedures in private aided schools.
Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. v. Aishwarya Chetan Khedkar and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the civil court's jurisdiction to protect a coparcener's interest in ancestral property against enforcement actions under the SARFAESI Act and held that sale of property in violation of injunction is illegal and void.
Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. v. Aishwarya Chetan Khedkar and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the civil court's jurisdiction to grant injunction protecting a coparcener's interest in ancestral property subject to SARFAESI proceedings and held that sale of property in violation of injunction is illegal and void.
Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited v. Aishwarya Chetan Khedkar
The Bombay High Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction over partition suits by non-borrowers despite SARFAESI Act enforcement actions, and transfers violating injunctions are void.
Praveen Begum & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Court held that a major daughter has the right to choose her residence and refused to order her return to her parents in a Habeas Corpus petition.
Sitaram Barwal and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that petitioners are entitled to grade pay of ₹5400 after four years in ₹4800 grade pay and directed re-fixation of pay and arrears accordingly.
BIMA SUGAM INDIA FEDERATION v. A RANGE GOWDA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff, backed by IRDAI's public announcements, is the prior user of the 'BIMA SUGAM' mark and granted interim mandatory injunction directing transfer of disputed domain names from Defendant No. 1, who acted in bad faith and engaged in cybersquatting.
Ram Jeevan Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that regularization applications must be considered by MCD without adjudicating pending title disputes, which are to be resolved in civil court, and declined to interfere with the property pending the suit.
Sh. Kuldeep Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition and vacation of property pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the need for natural justice and fair hearing.
Union of India & Ors. v. 622830 MWO Achyutanand Rai (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service absent contrary proof.
Union of India v. M/s UEE Electricals Engineers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, set aside the dismissal of the Section 34 petition for summary rejection without merit consideration, condoned delay, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the challenged claims.
Sanjay @ Sanjeev @ Baba v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to substantial doubts in the prosecution's police-only evidence and procedural lapses in a case of alleged illegal weapon possession and firing at police.
Shri Mangal Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture proceedings under SAFEM FOP Act require a valid nexus between illegal activities and properties, and quashed forfeiture orders lacking such nexus.
Prakash Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a retired IPS officer's petition seeking reimbursement for emergency medical treatment abroad, holding that existing rules and policies exclude pensioners from such benefits under CS (MA) Rules and CGHS.
Lokesh Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 42(a) of the BSF Rules does not bar disciplinary proceedings against a BSF personnel for facilitation or omission absent conspiracy with persons outside the force, and dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal order.
Madhawendra Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty to file afresh after the petitioner exhausts the remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal.