Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. v. OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST
The Supreme Court held that a bona fide purchaser from a decree holder who is in possession cannot file objections under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC in execution proceedings, affirming the finality of execution decrees and dismissing the appellant's appeal.
SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. v. OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST
The Supreme Court held that a bona fide purchaser from a decree holder is not entitled to file objections under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC in execution proceedings and must seek remedy by a separate suit.
Amit Manilal Haria; Hiren Uday Gada; Atul Hirji Maru v. The Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise
The Bombay High Court quashed penalties imposed under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act on company employees, holding that such penalties apply only to taxable persons and cannot be retrospectively imposed.
Rahul Sikri v. National Institute of Open Schooling
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition challenging the rejection of a correction application as time barred, remanding it for fresh consideration in light of a subsequent NIOS notification and Supreme Court precedent.
Director General Project Varsha v. Navayuga Van Oord JV
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral order restraining invocation of Bank Guarantees, holding that invocation letters complied with BG terms and no special equities justified injunction.
Rashmi Aditya Gupta v. Mangal Keshav Securities Ltd & Samir Kapadia
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on unauthorized F&O transactions and margin requirements, holding that judicial interference is limited to patent illegality or fundamental policy violations and that collateral securities satisfy margin obligations under NSE regulations.
Mayuresh Ajit Gambhir v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to failure of the prosecution to prove his identity beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting unreliable identification evidence and procedural lapses.
Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of Harpal Singh for murder and robbery based on credible eyewitness testimony, identification of recovered stolen articles, and corroborative evidence.
M/S RAMNATH EXPORTS PVT. LTD. v. VINITA MEHTA & ANR.
The Supreme Court held that a High Court must decide an application seeking permission to file a single appeal against consolidated suits before dismissing the appeal on maintainability grounds, thereby protecting the appellant's right to be heard on merits.
M/S RAMNATH EXPORTS PVT. LTD. v. VINITA MEHTA & ANR.
The Supreme Court held that a single appeal against two separate decrees passed in consolidated suits requires prior permission, and remanded the matter for such decision before dismissing the appeal on maintainability grounds.
Aman Sharma & Anr. v. Umesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the ownership of Plaintiffs based on a duly proved Will, dismissed the appeal of Defendants who failed to prove title, and held that a sale deed by a non-owner cannot transfer title.
Aman Sharma & Anr. v. Umesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the ownership and possession rights of Plaintiffs based on valid Will and succession, dismissing the appeal of purchasers who acquired property from a person without title.
Malkeet Singh Gill v. The State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for criminal breach of trust and cheating, affirming concurrent sentences and limiting revisional interference with concurrent factual findings.
Time Field Corporation v. Shri Sankalp Co-op. Housing Society Ltd.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of a consent decree obtained by fraud, holding that a co-operative society's property cannot be divested by fraudulent consent terms signed by conflicted parties.
Vodafone Idea Limited v. The Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that international inbound roaming and long distance telecom services provided by Vodafone Idea Limited to foreign telecom operators qualify as export of services under the IGST Act, entitling the company to refund of IGST paid.
Jayprakash Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Mrt v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the term of a cooperative society's managing committee was lawfully extended due to the Covid-19 pandemic and that a non-member lacked locus to challenge the committee, directing withdrawal of the show cause notice for appointment of an Administrator.
Adarsh Teotia v. Netra Institute of Geoinformatics Management and Technologies Foundation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking re-conduction of missed university exams, holding that the student failed to exercise due diligence despite official publication of exam schedules and provision of login credentials.
Rajiv Sanghvi & Ors. v. Pradip R. Kamdar & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a valid family settlement agreement is enforceable by specific performance in Civil Court despite pending NCLT proceedings, granting interim injunction to protect Plaintiffs’ rights under the agreement.
Damu Ramu Avhad v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside the conviction of a police officer under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to lack of evidence proving demand and acceptance of bribe, emphasizing the necessity of corroboration and proper investigation.
Hemant Vasant Jagtap v. Haji Abdul Malik Haji Yunusisa
The Bombay High Court held that police protection can be granted under Section 151 CPC to enforce a temporary injunction order amid admitted violation and apprehension of violence, even if an appeal is pending and relief under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC has not been sought.