Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of CRPF personnel for deliberately suppressing pending criminal cases in verification forms, affirming that such suppression justifies termination irrespective of subsequent acquittal.
Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld termination of CRPF personnel for deliberate suppression of pending criminal cases during recruitment, emphasizing the high integrity standards required in disciplined forces.
Balkrishna Rama Tarle v. Phoenix ARC Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the District Magistrate's role is ministerial to assist secured creditors in taking possession of secured assets without adjudicating tenancy disputes, which must be resolved separately before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Balkrishna Rama Tarle v. Phoenix ARC Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the District Magistrate's role is ministerial to assist secured creditors in taking possession of secured assets without adjudicating tenancy disputes, which must be resolved before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
The Supreme Court held that leave encashment forms part of salary payable jointly by State and aided institutions, while gratuity liability lies solely with the aided institution, and struck down arbitrary conditions denying these benefits upon absorption under the 2010 Rules.
Jagdish Prasad Saini v. Rajasthan State
The Supreme Court held that gratuity and cash payment in lieu of privilege leave form part of salary payable jointly by the State and aided institutions to employees absorbed under the 2010 Rules, setting aside the High Court's contrary order.
JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI & ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS
The Supreme Court held that leave encashment forms part of salary payable by State and aided institutions, while gratuity liability lies solely with aided institutions, setting aside the High Court's rejection of these claims.
Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.I v. Vijay Karia and others
The Bombay High Court held that a foreign arbitral award enforceable under the Arbitration Act is executable as a decree under the CPC, subject to compliance with FEMA and Indian laws, and dismissed Respondents' objections to execution.
Asian Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate General of Training to update the petitioner’s address and decide expeditiously on affiliation for additional units, ensuring compliance with natural justice and reasoned decision-making.
Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking v. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd
The Bombay High Court partially allowed the appeal, holding that reimbursement claims for entry and toll tax under a specific contract clause prevail over general price variation exclusions, while upholding the arbitral award on structural steel price variation.
Shri Bhagwan Tanaji Sawant v. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri
The Bombay High Court held that delay in filing revision applications under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act must be viewed liberally, setting aside dismissal on limitation grounds and directing hearing on merits.
Anwar Hussain J. Thim and M/s. Amit Builders v. State of Maharashtra and Others
The Bombay High Court held that inclusive housing regulations apply prospectively to revised commencement certificates issued after the notification date, and prior commencement certificates protect only the covered area from such regulations.
Sandip Sarjerao Sule & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR under Section 498A IPC and related offences based on an amicable settlement, emphasizing the need to make Section 498A compoundable to reduce litigation and hardship.
Abhishek Mahendra Umbarje v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that tribe validity certificates granted to blood relatives entitle petitioners to similar certificates, quashing the Scrutiny Committee's invalidation orders and directing issuance of Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe certificates.
M/s. Munjal Showa Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs
The Supreme Court upheld Customs Duty demand on forged DEPB licenses, affirming that fraud voids exemption and extended limitation applies, while buyer's knowledge affects only penalty, not duty liability.
M/s. Munjal Showa Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs
The Supreme Court upheld the demand of Customs Duty on forged DEPB licenses, affirming that fraud justifies invoking extended limitation and that duty liability arises regardless of the buyer's knowledge or intent.
Kalavati v. Mirza Kaisar Baig; Chandrakala v. Mirza Kaisar Baig
The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by fixing the deceased drivers' income at Rs.10,000 per month with future prospects, modifying the High Court's awards accordingly.
Kalavati v. Mirza Kaisar Baig; Chandrakala v. Mirza Kaisar Baig
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for loss of dependency in fatal accident claims by considering a higher monthly income, future prospects, and appropriate multipliers, partly allowing the appeals.
VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY v. BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE
The Supreme Court held that an order adding a party in an Admiralty Suit is not appealable under the Commercial Courts Act unless enumerated, and Gulf Petroleum FZC was neither a necessary nor proper party to the suit for misdelivery of cargo under the Bill of Lading.
Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai v. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that disputes over apportionment of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act must be resolved under Section 30 and quashed the High Court's order allowing a subsequent purchaser to be impleaded in an appeal challenging compensation enhancement.