Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Daikin Shri Ram Aircon Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the allowance of depreciation on exclusive business rights and intellectual property rights under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, rejecting Revenue's challenge that goodwill and unregistered trademarks are not eligible for depreciation.
Praveen Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to a petitioner discharged from the Indian Air Force before joining the Central Armed Police Forces, in line with binding precedents.
Mehendiram Foods Products Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the prequalification conditions of a government tender requiring bidders to have an existing running kitchen, holding that such conditions are reasonable and not arbitrary under Article 14.
Sushil Kumar Chauhan v. The State NCT Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a gang rape and murder case due to strong prima facie scientific evidence and the gravity of the offence.
MUFG BANK, LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DELHI AND ORS
Delhi High Court directs Income Tax authorities to comply with Tribunal's order on carry forward of losses and issue refund with interest within eight weeks.
Shahana Parveen v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a woman accused of extortion and related offences, emphasizing compliance with arrest procedure and balancing rights under Section 437(1) CrPC and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.
Raju Kondiram More v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murdering his wife by setting her ablaze, relying on corroborated dying declarations and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence.
Jyoti Jagtap v. National Investigating Agency & State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed bail to accused Jyoti Jagtap in the Bhima Koregaon case, holding that prima facie material under the UAP Act establishes her involvement with the banned CPI (Maoist) and conspiracy, thus bail is not warranted.
Mahadeo @ Jijya Nathu Thorve v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the assault occurred in sudden fight without premeditation.
Board of Governors in Supersession of Medical Council of India v. Dr. Priyambada Sharma & Others
The Supreme Court held that strict adherence to the Medical Council of India's admission schedule and merit-based counselling is mandatory, quashing High Court orders permitting provisional postgraduate medical admissions beyond the cut-off date.
Gurmail Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302/149 IPC, affirming that membership in an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit murder attracts vicarious liability even without overt acts by the accused.
Gurmail Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302/149 IPC of an appellant as a member of an unlawful assembly with common object to commit murder, affirming vicarious liability despite non-recovery of weapons and death of co-accused during appeal.
M/s. Fashion World v. Banshidhar Multi Builders Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal by setting aside orders striking off defence for non-payment of GST after deposit of dues and directed payment of enhanced rent as per lease terms.
M/s. Fashion World v. Banshidhar Multi Builders Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal setting aside orders striking off its defence for non-payment of GST after deposit of the amount and directed payment of rent with periodic enhancements as per the lease.
Sarup Singh @ Ram Sarup v. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying 40% future prospects, appropriate deductions, and fixed interest at 7.5% per annum, clarifying principles for loss of dependency and consortium.
M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot override a valid legislative enactment rescinding earlier tax exemptions under the CGST Act, dismissing appeals seeking continuation of 100% excise duty exemption post-GST implementation.
M/S HERO MOTOCORP LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that promissory estoppel cannot override a valid legislative rescission of tax exemptions under the CGST Act, dismissing appeals seeking continuation of 100% excise duty exemption post-GST implementation.
Radhey Sham v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to compensation at least at Rs. 1,000 per square yard as per the Reference Court's award not challenged by the State, setting aside the High Court's reduction of compensation.
Radhey Sham v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court held that landowners are entitled to compensation at least at Rs. 1,000 per square yard as accepted by the State, setting aside the High Court's order reducing compensation below that amount.
Manoj Kumar Tiwari v. Manish Sisodia & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a public servant can file a private complaint for defamation without following the special procedure under Section 199(4) CrPC, and dismissed appeals challenging the summoning orders in a defamation case.