Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sh. Rajat Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that absence of a post-mortem report alone cannot deny death compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act if medical evidence establishes causation, and remanded the matter for reassessment of compensation.
Vikash Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the medical boards' declaration of the petitioner as 'Unfit' due to Cubitus Valgus and Umbilical Hernia, affirming the binding nature of medical fitness findings supported by original reports.
Naresh & Anr. v. Vijay Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Trial Court's decree for recovery of possession and injunction in favor of the Respondent, holding that the Appellants failed to prove a concluded oral agreement for sale of immovable property.
Bagender Manjhi v. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on his one-year-old niece, affirming the reliability of parental testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence despite minor discrepancies.
Narender Khanna v. CVC and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the disciplinary inquiry and termination of an insurance company employee, holding that the inquiry was conducted fairly without bias or violation of natural justice.
Akshat Kedia v. M/S MLK Retail Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Commercial Court's refusal to dismiss a suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction at the initial stage, reaffirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and the need for factual adjudication of conflicting exclusive jurisdiction clauses.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Gautam Bhalla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that no additions under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act can be made in non-abated assessments without incriminating material found during the search.
Umar Khalid v. State of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed Umar Khalid's bail appeal under UAPA, holding that the accusations against him are prima facie true and the stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) apply.
Kanan Sarkar @ Ratna v. State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused under the NDPS Act after prolonged custody exceeding five years and trial delay, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional personal liberty.
Mr. Nivedan Bhimrao Torne v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Bombay High Court upheld the suspension of a municipal employee despite delayed charge-sheet issuance, directing timely completion of disciplinary proceedings without granting interim relief against final orders.
Roshini Kapoor v. Union of India
The High Court held that an accused granted bail with travel restrictions must seek prior trial court permission for international travel, which may consider and decide on any Look Out Circulars issued against the accused.
Guma Tech Marine Services v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court upheld the acquittal of a bank employee accused of forgery and criminal breach of trust, holding that mere verification of documents without evidence of collusion or benefit does not attract criminal liability under Sections 408 and 467 IPC.
Hitesh Santosh Vartak v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea in a rape case under Section 376 IPC and the Atrocities Act, holding that the prosecution made out a prima facie case and the appellant's antecedents justified denial of bail.
Haridas Raosaheb Bedare v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, acquitted him of dowry harassment charges, and sentenced him to 10 years imprisonment considering the incident occurred in sudden quarrel and heat of passion.
Ajay Ram Pandit v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to failure of the prosecution to conduct timely psychiatric examination despite knowledge of his mental illness, granting him benefit of doubt under Section 84 IPC.
Shri Namdeorao G Gadkh v. Nasik Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that failure to initiate acquisition within six months of a Purchase Notice under the MRTP Act causes reservation of land to lapse, invalidating subsequent acquisition proceedings.
Divya v. The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a severely disabled minor motor accident victim by applying the correct multiplier method and issued directions to safeguard the awarded amount.
Divya v. The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a permanently disabled minor motor accident victim by applying the multiplier method and issued directions for safeguarding the awarded amount.
Raj Bala v. Rakeja Begam
The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal enhancing compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the binding principles on future prospects and recognized heads of compensation from the Pranay Sethi Constitution Bench decision.
Dr. Manik Bhattacharya v. Ramesh Malik
The Supreme Court held that its interim protection order against coercive action by the CBI does not bar the Enforcement Directorate from arresting the petitioner under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, and dismissed the petitioner's applications challenging the arrest.