Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India v. Ram Roop Meena & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order rejecting recovery of LTC amounts from employees on the ground of unauthorized ticket purchase, holding that absent allegations or proof of fraud, recovery is unjustified.
Rahul Bhardwaj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears to the petitioner for his past Indian Air Force service, subject to eligibility, in line with applicable rules and precedents.
Relaxo Footwears Ltd v. Aqualite India Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed Relaxo's appeal, holding that the registered footwear design was prima facie novel and original, and reinstated the interim injunction against Aqualite for design infringement.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -3 v. Sh. Trilok Chand Choudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of a Rs. 20 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding no connection between the Assessee and the disputed MOU or cash transaction.
Guljari Harijan & Ors. v. M/S Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking dismissal of a compensation claim under the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that withdrawal without liberty does not bar a fresh claim and emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I v. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenditure and Section 14A disallowance for AYs 2012-13 and 2013-14, holding no international transaction existed for AMP expenses and no exempt income was earned.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Jagjit Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeals, upholding the motor accident compensation award based on negligence established by preponderance of probabilities and proper income assessment.
Kamdhenu Enterprises Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer Ward 14-2, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a second reassessment notice under Section 148 cannot be issued during pendency of reassessment proceedings and quashed the assessment order for non-disposal of objections and violation of natural justice.
Sanjay Chadha Trading as M/s Eveready Tools Emporium v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of the appellant's 'EVEREADY' trademark registration, holding it was dishonestly adopted in violation of the respondent's well-known trademark rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Khalid Kamal Faruqi v. Jamia Millia Islamia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the post of Archivist is not equivalent to Deputy Librarian for pay scale or retirement age benefits, dismissing the petition challenging retirement at 60 years.
Poonam Malhotra v. Vishal Goel
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to independently hear and decide the petitioner’s application under Order VIII Rule 10(A)(3) CPC, emphasizing that rejection of one application does not automatically decide another.
Surinder Singh and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of the LARSGESS Scheme as violative of Article 16, denying second chances or appointments to petitioners who failed the aptitude test, and dismissed their claims for relief.
Sh. Lakhan Singh v. M/S TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking order denying liberty to file a fresh compensation claim under the Employees’ Compensation Act, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders and protecting employees’ statutory rights.
Manohar Talreja v. Mahesh Talreja
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal in a property dispute case in terms of a valid settlement agreement reached through mediation, leaving no issue for adjudication.
Chander Prakash Wadhwa v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to file fresh bail applications on new medical grounds and directed the Trial Court to consider such applications with the aid of a Medical Board if necessary.
Chander Prakash Wadhwa v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Supreme Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider the petitioner's bail application on fresh medical grounds, allowing a fresh bail plea or challenge to the earlier rejection with the possibility of a Medical Board examination.
The Commissioner of Service Tax v. M/s. Surindra Engineering Co. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal for lack of jurisdiction under section 35L, upholding the CESTAT's view that laying pipelines is not taxable as erection, commissioning or installation service under the Finance Act.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -1 v. Nitin Ramdeoji Lohia
The High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions on alleged bogus purchases due to lack of proper investigation and evidence, but remanded the matter for consideration of gross profit rate enhancement.
Shivdatta @ Biltu Subhodchandra Sah v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to failure of prosecution to prove a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Eknath Ganpatrao Khadse v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging FIR registration and order permitting further investigation, holding that prior sanction provisions under the Prevention of Corruption Act apply prospectively and that further investigation can be ordered despite a closure report.