Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
FRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. TATA SIA AIRLINES LTD.
The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against Tata SIA Airlines, holding that the use of 'FLY HIGHER' is descriptive and not trademark infringement of Frankfinn's 'FLY HIGH' mark, given the distinct services and lack of likelihood of confusion.
Dr. Zafarul Islam Khan v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the salary increase notification for the Delhi Minorities Commission Chairperson is prospective and cannot be applied retrospectively without express statutory authorization, dismissing the appellant's plea for retrospective benefits.
Bharat Foundry and Engineering Works & Ors. v. Intec Capital Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld ex-parte arbitral awards and held that mere multiple appointments of the same arbitrator do not invalidate awards absent proof of bias or compromised impartiality.
Sorin Group Italia S.R.L v. Neeraj Garg
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery of unpaid invoices falls outside the arbitration clause and is maintainable before the court, dismissing the defendant's application for reference to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Tarlok Masih through L.R. Kanta Devi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is not entitled to the 2nd financial upgradation under the ACP scheme as her late husband was medically unfit and did not undergo the mandatory promotional course before voluntary retirement.
Bhawar Singh Gurjar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Rifleman for an inadvertent error in domicile code in the online application, holding that submission of correct domicile certificate and procedural fairness require reinstatement.
M/S BALAR MARKETING PVT. LTD. v. M/S KUNDAN CABLE INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a trademark dispute, holding that prior user rights and disputed factual issues must be decided at trial and that the trial court's discretion was rightly exercised.
Ex NB Risaldar Dilbag Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending mercy petition and representation for service pension within a stipulated timeframe, addressing undue delay.
Ruchika Puglani v. Aasna Digin
The Delhi High Court held that Section 10 CPC requires complete identity of cause of action, subject matter, and relief for stay of a later suit, and quashed the stay of an electricity restoration suit pending an eviction suit involving different parties and issues.
Sachin & Ors. v. Central Reserve Police Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF and Ministry of Home Affairs to complete delayed recruitment for Head Constable posts within eight months, holding officials personally liable for non-compliance.
M/S ARRENA OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S BATRA ART PRESS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's summary possession application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that disputed ownership and lease validity issues in a family-owned company require trial and cannot be decided on admissions alone.
Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd & Anr. v. Maruti Metals & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction protecting the well-known 'AMUL' trademark against identical use by a defendant on cookware, allowing interim use of 'AMULYA' pending final trial.
Medeor Hospital Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-04 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appeals filed but barred by limitation or admitted after the specified date are still 'pending' under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, invalidating CBDT's FAQ-59 condition requiring prior admission for settlement eligibility.
Neha v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging CISF's medical fitness criteria based on BMI, holding that courts will not interfere with Armed Forces' selection standards absent exceptional circumstances.
Shreysha Textiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Viss Incorporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that parties against whom specific allegations of fraud and conspiracy are made cannot be deleted from a suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC without trial on merits, setting aside the lower court's order deleting such parties.
University of Delhi v. Adil Sajeer Ansari
The Delhi High Court allowed the University's appeal, holding that a candidate's failure to submit admission documents within the prescribed deadline due to his own mistake does not warrant judicial intervention to grant admission or compensation.
KRBL Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13-1 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to pass appeal effect orders and refund Rs.38.35 crore with interest to KRBL Limited following an ITAT order in its favor.
IDBI Bank Ltd. v. Sujit Das Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed IDBI Bank's review petitions, condoned delay, and held that there is no right to legal representation before the Wilful Defaulter Committee following the Supreme Court's ruling.
Radical Arc Ventures Pvt Ltd v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a company is not a party under the Domestic Violence Act and ordered the return of its car wrongly retained in matrimonial dispute proceedings.
Ajay Gupta v. State CBI
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of a Sub-Inspector under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that credible alibi evidence and procedural lapses created reasonable doubt about his guilt.