Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nisha Sharma & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased victim in a motor accident caused by rash and negligent driving.
DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld FSSAI's regulatory ban on using 'ORS' in food product names to prevent consumer confusion and protect public health, dismissing the petition challenging the orders.
S.K. Singhal v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review petition and refused to allow new documents post-conclusion, affirming the limited scope of review and the lawfulness of disciplinary proceedings under CCS (CCA) Rules.
Taruna v. State Through SHO PS Jahangir Puri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus relief over alleged fraudulent adoption, holding that disputed factual issues and delay render the writ petition not maintainable.
Staff Selection Commission and Others v. Dinesh Chandra
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the Staff Selection Commission to empanel the respondent, ruling that administrative lapses in obtaining verification reports cannot prejudice a candidate's empanelment rights.
Union of India v. Laxman Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting Group A classification and attendant benefits to certain officers from the date of the 2009 office memorandum, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.
Mohd Shafi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if aggrieved.
V Balasubramanian v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that delay in deciding a transfer representation without mala fide does not amount to contempt.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sub Dilip Kumar Nanda (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law only.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld sealing of the petitioner’s premises in New Rajinder Nagar Market, ruling that commercial use of upper floors requires sanctioned plans and payment of conversion charges, and rejected de-sealing without factual and statutory compliance.
UMA KANT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
The Supreme Court held that teachers appointed without TET qualification but who acquired it within the statutory extended period cannot be terminated solely for non-possession at appointment and must be reinstated.
IN RE: Summoning Advocates who give legal opinion or represent parties during investigation of cases and related issues
The Supreme Court held that summoning Advocates to disclose privileged communications during investigations violates statutory protections and fundamental rights, quashing the impugned summons while declining to frame additional procedural guidelines.
KIMBERLEY CLUB PVT. LTD v. KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD
The Supreme Court held that a tendering authority cannot reject a technical bid for not submitting a 'haisiyat praman patra' from a District Magistrate when the tender conditions do not explicitly require it, and remanded the matter for reconsideration.
Lancor Holdings Limited v. Prem Kumar Menon
The Supreme Court held that an unexplained delay of nearly four years in pronouncing an arbitral award, which rendered the award unworkable and contrary to public policy, justified setting aside the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
ISON Builders LLP v. Om Sai Ram Cooperative Housing Society & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed interim reliefs against termination of a developer’s agreement for municipal tenanted property redevelopment, emphasizing tenants’ rights to timely redevelopment over developer’s profit interests, and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes.
Vishal Gupta v. Radha Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed official demarcation of disputed family property before adjudicating injunction claims, disposing of interlocutory applications alleging violation of status quo orders.
Atul Lakra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside a judgment passed by a non-designated Sessions Court for lack of jurisdiction under the Juvenile Justice Act and remanded the matter to the competent Children's Court for fresh adjudication.
M/S ACME INDIA v. DEPT OF TRADE AND TAXES (DELHI GST)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders passed after opportunity of personal hearing was not availed, directing the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit, while deferring the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax Delhi North
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand for fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appellate remedies under the CGST Act must be exhausted before seeking writ relief.
Jagdish Chand Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that arbitrators who were employees of a party were ineligible under the 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration Act, rendering the award void ab initio.