Mohd Shafi v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 31 Oct 2025 · 2025:DHC:9575-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 16541/2025
2025:DHC:9575-DB
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if aggrieved.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 16541/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 16541/2025
MOHD SHAFI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha, Ms. Shradha Mewati, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, SPC
WITH
Mr. Sarvesh Shrivastava and Ms. Himanshi Chhillar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA O R D E R (ORAL)
31.10.2025
JUDGMENT

1. With consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to treat the present writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from today and to communicate the order to learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. Needless to say, should the petitioner continue to remain aggrieved, remedies in law shall remain available to him.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 31, 2025