Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Yuvraj Datajirao Patil v. District Deputy Registrar Co-op. Societies, Kolhapur & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that disqualification of a cooperative society committee member for loan default under Section 73CA operates automatically upon due declaration, is not remedied by payment or resignation, and does not require a removal order under Section 78A.
Amy Mehta v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a serious sexual offence case for failure to consider investigation material and remitted the matter for fresh bail consideration.
Amy Mehta v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order in a sexual assault case for failure to consider the seriousness of offences and investigation material, remitting the matter for fresh bail consideration.
Leelamma Mathew v. Indian Overseas Bank
The Supreme Court held that a suit for compensation for deficiency in auctioned secured property is maintainable despite Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, and the Bank is liable for non-disclosure and handing over lesser area than sold.
Leelamma Mathew v. Indian Overseas Bank
The Supreme Court held that a suit for damages due to deficiency in auctioned property area under SARFAESI Act is maintainable and not barred by Section 34, allowing compensation where the Bank issued a sale certificate for more land than actually possessed.
M/s Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Another
The Supreme Court held that manufacturing and selling polyurethane foam, a product specified in the Eleventh Schedule, disqualifies the assessee from claiming deduction under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal and upholding the High Court's decision.
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Rameshwar @ Ramesh Chandra Sharma
The Supreme Court upheld enhanced compensation for land acquisition but denied statutory benefits and interest for a 22-year delayed appeal period, partly allowing NOIDA's appeal.
Pawan Kumar Goel v. State of U.P. & Another
The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of proceedings against a company director under Section 138 NI Act for non-impleadment of the company and absence of specific averments under Section 141, affirming that prosecution cannot proceed without arraigning the company and meeting statutory requirements.
Pawan Kumar Goel v. State of U.P. & Another
The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of prosecution against a company director under Section 138 NI Act for non-impleading the company and absence of mandatory averments under Section 141, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory requirements for vicarious liability.
M/s Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Another
The Supreme Court held that manufacturing and selling polyurethane foam, which falls under the Eleventh Schedule, disqualifies the assessee from claiming deduction under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, even if the foam is used by others to make automobile seats.
Nipun Goomer v. Sangeeta Goomer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a vague restriction in a Will preventing sale of property until a beneficiary is settled in married life is void, and granted a preliminary decree of partition in favor of the plaintiff for his rightful share.
NTPC Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the provident fund authorities' orders holding NTPC liable as principal employer, affirming that the claimant was an employee of BTPS Club and not NTPC, thus NTPC is not liable for provident fund dues.
Kapil Goel v. Ram Dulare Yadav @ Gandhi Bhai
The Delhi High Court held that where both parties refuse pre-institution mediation resulting in a Non-starter Report, the plaintiff's initiation of mediation satisfies the mandatory requirement under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, allowing the suit to proceed.
Ghansham Yashwant Dupate v. PEC Limited
The Delhi High Court held that terminal benefits of a superannuated employee cannot be withheld merely due to pending criminal proceedings without conviction, directing their release with interest, while adjourning pension claims pending challenge to the relevant scheme clause.
Vidhur Bhardwaj v. Horizon Crest India Real Estate & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award is barred by limitation if filed beyond three months from receipt of the award or disposal of a timely Section 33 application, and an incompetent Section 33 application does not extend limitation.
Vinita Verma v. Virender Katarmal & Anr
The court held that rival claimants can be impleaded as legal representatives of a deceased party for suit continuation, but disputes over Wills and estate shares must be resolved separately, directing procedural adjustments to ensure smooth trial conduct.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Starwood Hotel and Resorts Worldwide Inc.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that payments for centralized services do not constitute taxable 'Fee for Technical Services' under the Income Tax Act or Indo-US DTAA, following binding precedent in Sheraton International Inc.
Rakesh Rana & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld rejection of alternative plot allotment to petitioners owning property in village abadi and lal dora, affirming eligibility criteria under the 1961 Scheme for land acquisition rehabilitation.
Skipper Properties Private Limited & Anr. v. Sunrise Property Developers Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's part decree holding the appellant company and its director jointly liable to refund security deposit with interest, affirming that clear admissions in pleadings are binding and directors can be personally liable under express contractual provisions.
Murli Dhar v. M/S Apsara Biscuits Company
The Delhi High Court directed the Labour Court to grant the petitioner two more opportunities to lead evidence based on an existing affidavit while upholding the dismissal of a separate application to take additional documents on record.