Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Satpal Singh v. Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a terminated employee for wrongfully withholding company property under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013, affirming that summary criminal proceedings for eviction are maintainable despite pending civil or industrial disputes.
Krishan Kumar v. Land and Building Department and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternative plot allotment application under the 1961 Scheme, ruling that ownership of ancestral residential property in the village abadi area disqualifies eligibility and dismissed the writ petition for delay and lack of merit.
Murari Mirchandani v. Jatinder Sardna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed defendant no.5's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding the suit for specific performance maintainable against him under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
M/S DABUR INDIA LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court held that the 20% deposit condition for stay of tax demand under Section 201/201(1A) is not mandatory and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with directions for personal hearing.
Danish Faruqui v. Sana Ahmed
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing the father to cooperate in renewing the minor daughter's US passport, emphasizing the child's welfare as paramount and imposing travel restrictions to safeguard her interests.
Sheikhah Fadiah Saad Al-Abdullah Al-Sabah v. Sanjay Mishrimal Punamiya
The Bombay High Court held that forged tenancy agreements executed after the landlord's death do not confer rights, declared the Defendants trespassers, and granted equitable relief including appointment of a Court Receiver and mesne profits to the Plaintiff.
M/s. Renaissance Global Limited v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that import of finished jewellery for remaking within SEZs is permitted under the SEZ Act, and Customs authorities lack jurisdiction to impose penalties or confiscate such goods under the Customs Act.
Santu Sukhdeo Jaibhave & Ors. v. Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that failure to initiate acquisition within the statutory period after a valid Purchase Notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act causes reservation of land to lapse, and a Draft Revised Development Plan not yet sanctioned cannot invalidate such notice.
Devendra Ramlal Bidlan v. Commissioner of Police Pune City & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unreasonable delay in considering the detainee's representation and failure to furnish vital documents, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
QED Properties Private Limited v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a conditional Letter of Acceptance is not a concluded contract and its bona fide cancellation by a government undertaking is not arbitrary or illegal.
Anjali Vilas Deshpande & Ors. v. Prabha Rajendra Gupta & Ors.
The Bombay High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by holding that the deceased's income should be determined based on Form 16, including future prospects, and awarded appropriate amounts for loss of consortium and other conventional heads.
Dr. Anand Teltumbde v. National Investigation Agency & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the bail plea of Dr. Anand Teltumbde in a UAP Act case, holding that reasonable grounds exist to believe the accusations against him are prima facie true under Section 43-D.
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. M/S Sew Construction Limited
The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award granting escalation claims under a construction contract where conditions precedent were satisfied, rejecting res judicata and limiting administrative discretion.
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. M/S Sew Construction Limited & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award granting escalation to the Contractor under a contract clause requiring written permission for quarry change, rejecting the State's plea of res judicata and limitation.
Ganesh Sidhanth Khilare v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that an education authority cannot review or cancel an appointment approval without fraud or misrepresentation and directed entry of the petitioner's name in the Shalarth ID system.
Sabita Patra and ors v. The State of Maharashtra and anr
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR alleging outrage of modesty under Section 354 IPC, holding the complaint to be malicious and the allegations unsubstantiated, thereby preventing abuse of process of law.
EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PVT LTD v. G D GOENKA PUBLIC SCHOOL
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable completion of arbitration proceedings.
Arun Kumar Verma v. Bipin Kumar Srivastava and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the motor accident compensation by recognizing the appellant's actual income, adjusting disability and future prospects, and awarding just damages and interest under Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Deepak Rautela v. Pearl Global Industries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that the dispute over salary arrears and employment status is civil in nature and does not disclose any criminal offence under Sections 406 or 420 IPC.
Smt. Kali Devi Meena & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that a belated DRM report cannot negate the claim of bona fide passengers injured due to falling from a moving train, recognizing the incident as an 'untoward incident' entitling compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act.