Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Adani Enterprises Limited v. State Trading Corporation of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition enforcing an arbitral award after the parties entered into a valid and binding settlement agreement resolving all disputes.
Naziya Banu Abdul Hafiz Ansari @ Jabbar Sofi v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the invalidation of a caste certificate obtained through fraudulent documents, dismissing the petitioner’s writ challenging her disqualification from reserved local body elections.
Indian Council for Agricultural Research v. Pramod Nischal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing reimbursement of actual medical expenses for emergency hip replacement surgery under CGHS, rejecting limitation to CGHS rates.
M/S Sab Developers v. M/S Vijay Enterprises
The High Court held that the arbitration agreement survives termination of the main contract and parties must be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside the lower court's rejection of the arbitration application.
Kishore Jetha Somai v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld RBI's termination of a candidate appointed under ST reservation whose caste certificate was invalidated, holding that provisional appointments subject to caste verification can be lawfully terminated and writ jurisdiction does not extend to disputed factual issues.
Namrata Tapan Bose v. Sunita Vilas Gaonkar
The Bombay High Court upheld the Petitioners’ right to dissolve the partnership firm under a final arbitral award, ordered court receiver possession, and forensic audit to protect their interests against Respondents’ contumacious conduct.
Nileshkumar Jashvantsinh Parmar & Ors. v. Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that an amendment application based on a new cause of action arising during trial can be allowed without applying the due diligence test under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and dismissed the petition challenging such amendment.
Rohit Dewan v. Syndicate Bank
The Bombay High Court held that an employee can validly withdraw resignation before it becomes effective upon expiry of the notice period, and directed reinstatement of the petitioner whose resignation withdrawal was unlawfully rejected.
Rajani Dattaram Tanawade & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that tenants in redevelopment schemes are entitled to full 35% fungible FSI over 300 sq.ft carpet area, directed additional parking allotment, and ordered reconsideration of amenity space reduction.
Kamlakar Motiram Satve and Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
The Bombay High Court condoned developers' delay in completing flats under the Powai Area Development Scheme, recorded compliance with interim orders, lifted restrictions on further development, and disposed of related public interest litigations.
Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Look Out Circulars issued by NCB-India pursuant to INTERPOL Red Corner Notices, dismissing challenges to their legality and clarifying that Indian courts do not examine the merits of foreign criminal proceedings in such cases.
JCB India Limited & Anr. v. The Competition Commission of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the CCI's investigation order into alleged abuse of dominance through design infringement litigation after the parties settled the dispute, emphasizing the sanctity and finality of mediation and settlements.
Purple Products Private Limited v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that the Customs Authorities have jurisdiction under the Customs Act to adjudicate alleged misrepresentation in imports without first resorting to the treaty-based dispute resolution mechanism under Article 24 of AIFTA, which is not incorporated into Indian law.
Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd. v. Imagine Realty Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held it has jurisdiction to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29-A, refused to substitute the arbitrator for alleged delay and bias, and extended the mandate by six months.
Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 v. Citron Infraprojects Limited
The Bombay High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of prior approvals under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act due to total non-application of mind, invalidating reassessment proceedings under Section 153A and dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Nitin Rajendra Gupta v. Deputy Collector, Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that under Section 23(1) of the Senior Citizens Act, the condition of providing basic amenities to a senior citizen need not be expressly stated in a gift deed but can be established by evidence, while also clarifying that the Tribunal erred in ordering possession without considering co-ownership.
Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay v. Tanaji Babaji Lad & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held IIT Bombay liable to pay gratuity to contract laborers engaged through multiple contractors, affirming the Controlling Authority's jurisdiction to determine employer-employee relationship under the Payment of Gratuity Act.
Madhuri Dnyaneshwar Khandeshe v. State of Maharashtra
The court upheld the Education Officer's order applying the 2023 Notification to determine seniority, holding that Suresh's seniority dates from his B.A. degree in 1996 due to retroactive application of amended MEPS Rules.
Ravikiran Vasant Gore v. M/s. Sainath Enterprises Partnership Firm & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appellate court’s order lifting the temporary injunction restraining development of disputed property, holding that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and balance of convenience for interim relief.
Padam Singh Bagga v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous following the disposal of a subsequent petition challenging the petitioner's compulsory retirement.