Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Preeti Pahwa and Anr. v. MCD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed repair and strengthening work on a disputed property subject to MCD permissions after an independent structural engineer found no dangerous condition, dismissing the petition against alleged illegal construction.
Rajbir Singh v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a regularization application against a demolition notice and restrained coercive action during its pendency, directing the Cantonment Board to consider the application fairly.
BSES Yamuna Power Limited v. Ved Prakash & Anr.
The Delhi High Court modified CGRF orders directing BSES Yamuna Power Limited to issue notices to MCD, holding that the petitioner must assess property status from MCD’s website and that CGRF cannot impose procedural directions beyond its statutory authority.
Rajesh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to consider representations for protection under the Delhi Special Laws 2011 before proceeding with demolition of properties alleged to have unauthorized construction.
TV Today Network Ltd. & Ors. v. Ramesh Bidhuri
The Delhi High Court held that Magistrates have no power to discharge accused in summons triable criminal defamation cases and dismissed the petitioners’ applications seeking discharge, directing them to face trial.
Rajneesh Pandey Alias Vipul Pandey & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354(B), 506, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Manish Pandey & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Prashant Kumar Singh & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Naresh Kumar and Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Puneet Verma and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 377, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Quantum Hi-Tech Merchandising Pvt. Ltd. v. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court dismissed appellant's appeal against refusal of interim injunction in trademark dispute due to appellant's concealment of material facts and invalid registration of the word mark QUANTUM.
Irina Tankha v. Anirudh N. Tankha
The Delhi High Court upheld interim custody of a minor child with the father, emphasizing the child's welfare over statutory presumptions and restraining the mother from removing the child from India amid apprehensions of flight risk.
Roopinder Singh v. Emaar MGF Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that the appellant's bona fide and diligent prosecution of earlier proceedings before consumer fora and civil courts lacking jurisdiction entitled him to exclusion of such time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, setting aside the dismissal of his suit as barred by limitation.
Patparganj FIE Entrepreneurs Association v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging MCD’s parking proposal on an arterial road, holding that expert traffic police recommendations permitting parking on one side must be respected and that such municipal decisions do not violate the statutory layout plan if traffic flow is not impeded.
INTIME VINCOM PVT LTD v. GAIL INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld GAIL's lawful annulment of a tender without assigning reasons, holding that such power is not arbitrary if exercised with procedural fairness and within the tender terms.
Ajmera Ramulu v. B Chandrakala
The Delhi High Court held that a marriage solemnized by Scheduled Tribe members according to Hindu rites is governed by the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 despite statutory exclusions, dismissing the appeal challenging the Family Court's jurisdiction.
Anuradha Bhattacharjee v. Anu Radha
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the suit for trial, holding that damages claims for unauthorized use of a person's name cannot be dismissed without affording an opportunity to lead evidence.
Shravan Gupta v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of non-bailable warrants against the petitioner for wilful evasion of investigation in a serious economic offence, rejecting his plea to appear via video conferencing and dismissing allegations of mala fide and discrimination.
Kingsley Nwanne v. Narcotic Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a foreign national accused of narcotics trafficking under the NDPS Act, holding that the stringent twin conditions for bail in commercial quantity cases were not met despite procedural irregularities and delay in trial.
Jascent Nakalungi v. Narcotic Control Bureau Delhi Zonal Unit
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a foreign national accused of trafficking commercial quantities of narcotics, upholding the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act despite prolonged custody and delay in trial.