Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Fauzia Rubbani v. Delhi Woman Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the employer to comply with the POSH Act by constituting an Internal Complaints Committee, awarded costs for non-compliance, and empowered the Delhi Commission for Women to pass final orders on the sexual harassment complaint.
Shailesh Kumar v. State; Mahesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted two brothers of murdering their sibling due to incomplete circumstantial evidence, unreliable recovery of the alleged murder weapon, and lack of motive or last seen proof.
Himmat Dalichand Mali v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The court dismissed the petition seeking antedating of promotion and seniority correction, holding that disciplinary penalties and delay in representation bar such relief.
Shri Vignahar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
The High Court upheld the appellate court's decision that a co-operative society's dispute filed by its Managing Director was maintainable despite initial technical objections on authorization, and dismissed the petition challenging the monetary award.
National Highways Authority of India v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court allowed NHAI to execute the Vadodara Mumbai Expressway project involving limited mangrove felling within CRZ-IA, affirming permissible development under sustainable development principles and CRZ Notification.
Vijay Suryakant Kakade v. Anushka Vijay Kakade
The Bombay High Court held that proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act can be transferred to the Family Court where related matrimonial proceedings are pending, without depriving parties of their statutory appeal rights or right to speedy justice.
wp27222023 01abb1b0
The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal's order invalidating retrospective application of Government Resolutions allowing SEBC candidates to avail EWS reservation after the SEBC Act was struck down, affirming adherence to original recruitment rules and constitutional provisions.
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Employees Union v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court held that excluding pre-cut-off date retirees from Fifth Pay Commission salary benefits by MSFC is unconstitutional discrimination under Article 14, directing extension of benefits with arrears to all eligible retirees except VRS beneficiaries.
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Former Employees Association v. Maharashtra State
The Supreme Court held that excluding MSFC employees retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010 from Fifth Pay Commission salary revision benefits is discriminatory and directed payment of arrears with interest, while upholding the cut-off date for others.
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Employees Association v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court held that excluding employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010 from Fifth Pay Commission pay revision arrears violates Article 14, allowing them arrears with interest, while denying such benefits to VRS employees.
Shyam Kumar Gupta and Others v. Shubham Jain
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the ex parte decree in a tenancy eviction suit, holding that mandatory deposit of decretal amount is essential but subsequent bona fide compliance entitles the party to contest the suit on merits.
Shyam Kumar Gupta v. Shubham Jain
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal setting aside an ex parte decree for rent arrears and eviction, holding that partial compliance with Section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act coupled with bona fide deposit entitles the defendant to contest the suit on merits.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld Section 33(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, ruling that Parliament's legislative policy permitting candidates to contest from up to two constituencies simultaneously does not violate fundamental rights.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 33(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, ruling that Parliament's legislative policy permitting candidates to contest from up to two constituencies simultaneously is not unconstitutional.
Snehasis Giri v. Subhasis Mitra
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of madrasa teacher appointments made during pendency of appeals subject to verification of eligibility and recruitment norms, limiting contempt jurisdiction to enforcing explicit judgment directions and constituting a committee to verify claims.
Snehasis Giri v. Subhasis Mitra
The Supreme Court held that appointments under the West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act are valid subject to verification of eligibility and recruitment norms, limiting contempt jurisdiction to enforcing explicit directions and constituting a committee to verify claims before releasing salaries.
Baini Prasad v. Durga Devi
The Supreme Court upheld the owner’s right to recover possession from an encroacher, rejecting claims based on estoppel and Section 51 of the Transfer of Property Act, and restored the Trial Court’s decree for demolition and possession.
M/s Railroad Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Branch Manager, Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for contractual disputes involving disputed facts and monetary claims where an alternative civil remedy exists, dismissing the petition challenging the Banking Ombudsman's order.
Rashtriya Khadya Nigam v. Jagadish Balaram Bahira
The Supreme Court upheld the denial of a Scheduled Caste certificate to the petitioner, affirming that only genuine members of notified Scheduled Castes are entitled to such certification and benefits.
Bhadubhita Das v. Anayabhaban
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's Scheduled Caste certificate by the Tahsildar after proper investigation, emphasizing procedural fairness and evidentiary standards in caste certificate disputes.