Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors and Others
The Supreme Court held that commercial enterprises taking insurance policies for indemnification of loss are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and their complaints against insurers are maintainable before consumer forums.
Parshvanath Developers Pvt Ltd v. Chandigarh Housing Board
The High Court upheld the binding nature of arbitral awards and Supreme Court orders directing the Developer to pay interest on delayed payments and share dues with Chandigarh Housing Board in a 70:30 ratio, dismissing the Developer's appeals.
Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Gagandeep Brar
The Supreme Court held that compensation for delay in construction under the Flat Buyer Agreement must be shared between the Developer and Chandigarh Housing Board in a 70:30 ratio as per the binding arbitration award.
M/S KAMLADITYYA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD v. RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause permitting unilateral appointment of arbitrators by one party is invalid and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council
The Delhi High Court corrected its earlier order to accurately record the petitioner's submission on the nature of contracts and held that the arbitrator shall independently decide whether the contracts are works contracts involving services without being influenced by the Court's observations.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Aman Sanjay Tak
The Bombay High Court held that medical reimbursement received under a separate Mediclaim Policy cannot be deducted from compensation awarded by the insurer of the offending vehicle in a motor accident claim.
The Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation v. Mr. Shrinivasan Ramchandra Pai
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal of Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation based on credible eyewitness testimony identifying the BEST bus as the offending vehicle despite registration number discrepancies.
M/s. P. P. Associate v. Mira Bhayander Municipal Corporation & State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Clause 3.0(vi) of the 2016 TDR regulations, holding that lawful possession taken before the notification excludes entitlement to additional TDR under the new scheme.
Chinmay Gurunath Parale v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the reservation for a children's play park lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within statutory time after a valid purchase notice by the landowner.
Keyur Kiritkumar Modi; Jugal Bhupendralal Modi; Bhimesh Narendra Mehta v. The State of Maharashtra; Ramesh Kashinath Bhosale
The Bombay High Court quashed criminal proceedings against builders in a flat sale dispute, holding that the allegations constituted a civil dispute and did not disclose any offence under the IPC.
Unic Healthcare & Ors. v. Pneumo Care Health Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that filing a written statement by email directly to the court, acknowledged by the court and followed by filing hard copies within time, constitutes valid filing under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Dabur India Ltd v. The Registrar of Trade Marks Trade Marks Registry & Anr.
The Delhi High Court approved and enforced a settlement agreement resolving trademark disputes between Dabur India Ltd. and other parties concerning the use of the word 'SUPER', resulting in disposal of all connected proceedings.
KKH Finvest Private Limited & Anr. v. Sharad Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Memorandum of Settlement containing an arbitration clause, directing all related claims to arbitration and disposing of interim relief petitions accordingly.
M/S SPACE 4 BUSINESS SOLUTION PVT v. DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER NORTH WEST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a payment dispute arising from a tender agreement, following the parties' consent to arbitration.
RAMA CIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD v. DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve contractual payment disputes where the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator.
Vineet Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending leave application within 10 days, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Meeta Chakraborty and Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for interest on delayed 7th CPC arrears, balancing employees' rights with the school's financial hardship and Court-directed compliance.
Tata Power Company Limited v. Genesis Engineering Company
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising from composite works contracts are arbitrable under the Arbitration Act and not barred by MSME Act proceedings, appointing a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.
ICICI BANK LTD. v. SUDEEP NASKAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as there was no order passed by the trial court on the application for appointment of receiver, rendering the appeal non-maintainable.
Shri Rajinder Dhawan & Ors. v. Gobind Parshad Jagdish Parshad & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of sub-tenants for illegal sub-letting without landlord's written consent or notice, affirming that sub-tenants lack independent tenancy rights absent statutory compliance.