Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 v. Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, assessments reopening completed assessments require incriminating material found during search; absent such material, no additions can be made.
Suneetha Narreddy v. Y S Avinash Reddy
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's interim order granting anticipatory bail and restricting investigation procedures in a murder conspiracy case, emphasizing that such directions unduly hamper investigation and extended the investigation deadline.
Rockline Construction Company v. Doha Bank QSC & Ors.
The Supreme Court directed the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal to decide the rate of interest and mesne profits on a refunded auction sale amount expeditiously, rejecting limitation objections and refusing to interfere with prior orders.
Rockline Construction Company v. Doha Bank QSC & Ors.
The Supreme Court directed the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously decide the pending appeal on the rate of interest and mesne profits payable on the refund of a set-aside auction sale amount, holding that limitation shall not bar the appeal.
Jitendra Kumar Rode v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that appellate courts cannot uphold convictions without trial court records, emphasizing the accused's right to a fair trial and mandating retrial or reconstruction of lost records.
Jitendra Kumar Rode v. Union of India
The Supreme Court set aside a corruption conviction upheld without trial court records, holding that appellate courts must peruse complete records to ensure fair trial rights under Article 21.
Jitendra Kumar Rode v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that conviction cannot be upheld without the trial court record, as it violates the accused's right to a fair trial under Article 21, and remanded the case for fresh trial.
Jitendra Kumar Rode v. Union of India
The Supreme Court set aside a corruption conviction upheld without trial court records, holding that appellate courts must peruse complete records under Section 385 CrPC to protect the accused's fundamental rights under Article 21.
Maghavendra Pratap Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of Maghavendra Pratap Singh due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and flawed investigation, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of evidence and proper proof of criminal conspiracy.
Ali Hussain Ishaq Ali Vohra & Ors v. State of Gujarat & Ors
The Supreme Court held that withdrawal of a writ petition with a prayer for liberty to file afresh permits filing a fresh petition even if the dismissal order does not expressly mention such liberty, and restored the subsequent petition for adjudication on merits.
Union of India v. JWO Dusyant Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order granting disability pension for hypertension detected during military service, affirming the presumption of service attribution and placing the burden on the establishment to disprove it.
Taher Fakhruddin Saheb v. Mufaddal Burhanuddin Saifuddin
The Bombay High Court dismissed the suit challenging the succession to the 53rd Dai al-Mutlaq, holding that the Plaintiff failed to prove a valid and irrevocable nass appointment, thereby upholding the Defendant's claim.
Niharika v. Vikas Rajora
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to transfer a family court case from Patiala House to Karkardooma Family Court following no objection from the respondent.
JMD Heritage Lawns Private Limited v. Mr. Ankit Chawla Proprietor Sadda Pind Restaurant
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a clerical error in its earlier judgment to accurately reflect the defendant's undertaking regarding withdrawal of a trademark application.
Faraz Khan @ Babloo v. State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for interim bail on medical grounds, holding that the petitioner was receiving adequate medical treatment in jail and no urgent necessity for release was established.
Naveen @ Pelu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a Section 304 IPC case, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for prima facie satisfaction before denying bail in serious offences.
Manish Choudhary v. Chairman Indian Red Cross Society & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's order and directed the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order before the Tribunal.
Bell Finvest (India) Limited & Ors. v. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award enforcing full loan repayment, holding that the arbitrator's interpretation was plausible and no procedural prejudice or bias was established.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. The P.O., Yad Ram
The Delhi High Court held that unauthorized absence, even if recorded as leave without pay, constitutes misconduct warranting dismissal approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's contrary award.
Yad Ram Conductor v. DTC
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award dismissing a workman for unauthorized absence, holding that Section 10 proceedings are independent of Section 33(2)(b) approval and that the enquiry and dismissal were valid.