Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Harjit Singh and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Manohar Lal & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties in a private property dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Yogesh Kumar Verma & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against accused persons for assault and arms offences, affirming that prima facie case exists and supplementary statements can validly add accused at the charge framing stage.
Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation v. M/S Power Mech Projects Limited
The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with deposit conditions under Section 36 does not warrant dismissal of a Section 34 challenge and remanded the matter for merits hearing after compliance.
Suresh Chand v. Management of Ramjas College & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that subsistence allowance ceases upon retirement and that alleged unequal treatment cannot be claimed on the basis of irregular benefits granted to others, dismissing the petitioner’s writ seeking subsistence allowance post superannuation and parity with a co-employee.
Mangesh Dhillod v. Bal Vikas Samiti
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-reinstatement and back wages after the respondent school’s derecognition, holding that writ jurisdiction cannot reappraise facts and the managing committee’s decision on back wages was valid.
Neelam Goel v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious execution of maintenance orders and effective enforcement of warrants to ensure timely payment to a wife and her children, emphasizing the social welfare purpose of Section 125 Cr.P.C.
EASYPHOTOVOLTECH PVT LTD v. BENARA BEARINGS AND PISTONS LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that an interim arbitral award containing final observations does not bar final adjudication and directed deposit of the awarded amount with liberty for document inspection upon application.
Pele Khezhie v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court held that conciliation under the contract is directory, not mandatory, and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from contract termination notices and non-performance declarations.
Deepak & Ors. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging DSSSB's inaction in recruitment, holding that the petitioners must first exhaust the alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Yves Saint Laurent Parfums S.A v. Vinod Asrani
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition to remove the expired trademark “WHITE OPIUM” from the register due to non-renewal and non-use.
State v. Ravinder @ Bittoo
The High Court set aside the discharge under section 376 IPC for failure to consider the FIR and section 164 statement, remanding the case for framing of charge after proper judicial scrutiny.
Gripple Limited & Anr. v. Absolute Air Solutions & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the 'GRIPPLE' trademark after they undertook not to use it, with plaintiffs foregoing damages and costs.
TPF Getinsa Euroestudios, SL in Association with Segmental Consulting & Infrastructure Advisory (P) Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator as per contract terms and treated the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act as an application under Section 17 for interim reliefs, without deciding the merits of the termination dispute.
Ravi Dhingra v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of summons and discharge applications against a director under Sections 138 and 141 NI Act, holding that liability depends on being in charge of company affairs at the time of offence and resignation must be effective to absolve responsibility.
Hari Mohan Singh & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 308/34 IPC and 323/341/354/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the nature of injuries, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Ramdev@Aman v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in an attempt to murder case, holding that parity with co-accused granted bail is not a right when the accused’s role and evidence against him are distinct and grave.
Castrol Limited v. Pawan Kumar, Trading as Bluextar Lubricants
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Castrol Limited against Bluextar Lubricants for trademark infringement and passing off by using deceptively similar marks and trade dress.
Union of India & Ors. v. LT COL C Preveen Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related unless the employer disproves it, and underscoring the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.
Sakharam G. Mahadik & Another v. Swagat Builders and Developers & Others
The Bombay High Court allowed the revision applications and rejected the plaint in a civil suit challenging municipal corporation resolutions and seeking compensation, holding the suit barred by statutory limitation and non-disclosure of cause of action under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.