Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Atlantech Online Services Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Google India Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the time limit for filing replication under Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules is mandatory and cannot be extended beyond 45 days, dismissing the plaintiffs' application for condonation of delay.
M/S TIRUPATI CYLINDERS LTD. v. M/S J.V.G. FINANCE LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed TCL's appeal, holding that fraudulent and unauthorized transactions involving JVG Group companies' assets during winding up proceedings cannot confer title, affirming the lifting of the corporate veil and rejecting TCL's claim to certain lands.
Shiv Ganga Udyog v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration and rejection of revocation application due to lack of specific reasons and procedural infirmities, directing restoration of registration.
Tarika v. Ashwani Kumar Kansal
The Delhi High Court held that no appeal lies under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act against dismissal of a contempt petition without punishment, affirming that jurisdiction to punish for contempt arises only upon imposition of punishment.
Abhishek Grover v. Inderjeet Grover
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a possession suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits subject to costs and strict conditions.
Anil Kumar v. Election Commission of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the First-Level Checking of EVMs and VVPATs, holding that the process complied with ECI guidelines and that the petitioner’s non-participation did not justify re-initiation.
Central Park Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Others v. Provident Housing Limited
The Delhi High Court held that without a specific plea of invalidity of the plaintiff's trademark in the pleadings, the defendant is not entitled to an adjournment under Section 124(1)(ii) of the Trade Marks Act to file a rectification petition.
Kapri International Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Department
The Delhi High Court directed re-examination of a rejected tax settlement application under the VSV Act, clarified interest payable in liquidation, and resolved multiple claims and procedural issues related to Kapri International Pvt. Ltd.'s liquidation.
Gulshan Rai v. Hotel Queen Road Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition where the debt was bona fide disputed and a civil suit was pending, reaffirming that winding up cannot be used to enforce disputed debts.
Vikramjit Kaur and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions challenging the Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief for opting under the Old Pension Scheme, without expressing opinion on merits, relying on respondents' assurance that relief can be granted upon success before the Tribunal.
Seema Ahlawat v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that clinical bedside teaching does not qualify as teaching experience as a Lecturer for Associate Professor eligibility, affirming deference to expert statutory bodies and limiting judicial interference in academic appointments.
M/S J.J. International Pvt Ltd v. M/S Ramada Hotel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition due to a bona fide dispute over the debt, emphasizing that disputed liabilities must be resolved through civil suits before winding up proceedings.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Kailash Chandra Gairola and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award, affirming that claimants need only prove their case on the preponderance of probabilities despite delayed eyewitness disclosures.
Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain
The Delhi High Court allowed certain relevant allegations in a guardianship affidavit to stand while expunging scandalous and extraneous paragraphs, emphasizing the child's welfare and procedural fairness.
Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to confront the respondent with audio and video recordings made in violation of a restraining order, holding that a party cannot benefit from its own contempt and emphasizing the paramountcy of child welfare in guardianship proceedings.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. SUNIL KUMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination for a LASIK-operated candidate applying for Fire Operator post, emphasizing that corrected vision meeting standards cannot be sole ground for disqualification.
State Bank of India v. Stephen Aranha & Ors.
The High Court held that a guarantor's liability is extinguished upon creation of stipulated collateral security, and acknowledgment letters signed as director do not revive personal guarantee liability.
Narender Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Staff Selection Commission to appoint the petitioner, who was wrongly debarred, following judicial precedents granting relief to similarly placed candidates.
Usha Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-36(1) Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an assessment order passed without affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to respond, emphasizing adherence to natural justice in tax proceedings.
Reenu Ruhela v. Ashwani Kumar Kansal
The Delhi High Court held that no appeal lies under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act against dismissal of a contempt petition without punishment, dismissing the appellant's appeal as not maintainable.