Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Smriti Madan Kansagra v. Perry Kansagra
The Delhi High Court held that service of notice through email is valid in family law proceedings and directed the Family Court to proceed ex parte against the respondent who evaded service.
Sanjeeva Shukla v. State Through EOW
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a multi-crore economic offence case, emphasizing the presumption of innocence, limited involvement, and completion of investigation.
P. Sasi v. CBI
The Delhi High Court upheld the statutory bar under Section 6 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, prohibiting the use of Commission statements for cross-examination, thereby dismissing the petition challenging the trial court's order.
Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of accused in large-scale DDA property fraud case citing prima facie complicity, prior convictions, and risk of tampering with evidence.
DLT Global Inc v. DLT Labs Technologies Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that summons were never validly served on defendants as per mandatory Original Side Rules, thus dismissal of plaintiff's application for judgment under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC was warranted.
Abhishek Jain (Trading as M/s Trip Planners) v. Trip Planners Holidays Private Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark dispute suit by recording a binding settlement agreement reached through court mediation, enforcing cessation of trademark use and withdrawal of conflicting applications.
Saba Azmi v. Parvez Alam @ Jolly
The Delhi High Court held that a Nikahnama obtained without the bride's consent and appearance before the Qazi is null and void, thereby invalidating the purported marriage.
Manpreet Kaur v. Pushpinder Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to recall the withdrawal of an appeal against a divorce decree, holding that cohabitation and settlement under Section 125 CrPC do not annul a divorce decree and subsequent hardship does not justify recalling the order.
Sunil Chaduhary v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the departmental chargesheet at the preliminary stage, holding that inquiry proceedings should not be interfered with before their conclusion.
R X Infotech Private Limited v. Jalpa Rajesh Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court held that it has territorial jurisdiction over a trademark infringement suit involving online sales accessible in Delhi, dismissing the defendant's application to reject the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Wasim Ahmad & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Swati Sharma v. Ashwani Kumar Kansal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that no appeal lies under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act against dismissal of a contempt petition without punishment, affirming that jurisdiction to punish for contempt arises only upon imposition of punishment.
Yuvraj Singh Puar v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD’s sanction of a building plan interpreting DCR 4.4.[3] to allow larger plots to avail ground coverage and FAR of the largest lower category plot with reduced setbacks, dismissing the petitioner’s writ challenge under Article 226.
Suraj v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the primacy of Article 21 liberty rights and relaxing Section 37 conditions due to prolonged pre-trial incarceration.
Abhishek Kumar & Ors. v. The Secretary Dental Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Regulation 11 of the Dental Council of India Screening Test Regulations, 2009, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the viva-voce qualifying criteria as a valid expert measure not violative of constitutional rights.
Naresh Kumar Mittal & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered by CBI for bank fraud due to violation of a prior stay order and non-compliance with mandatory sanction provisions under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Vikender Singh Yadav v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a CISF Sub Inspector accused under Section 354 IPC and POCSO Act, imposing conditions including relocation beyond 5 km from the minor victim’s residence.
M/s Acme Resources Ltd. v. Hotel Royal Plaza & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition against a company due to a bona fide dispute over the debt and a pending civil suit, reaffirming that winding up cannot be used to enforce disputed debts.
Deepak and Others v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
HERITAGE HOLIDAYS PVT LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 10 1 DELHI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer must be allowed to inquire into disputed property sale valuations and possession transfers, with procedural compliance ensured.