Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anil Dutt Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s writ petition seeking quashment of FIR and criminal proceedings as an abuse of process, affirming that no interference is warranted absent substantial questions of law.
S. S. Industries v. Pavan Kumar Gupta Trading as Vapnr Traders
The Delhi High Court held that ex parte seizure orders under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC require prior opportunity to the defendant and allowed use of seized machinery pending interim injunction decision.
Neelam Malik v. DSSSB and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s dismissal of a candidate’s claim to appear in Tier-II Examination after failing to secure minimum qualifying marks in Tier-I as prescribed in the recruitment advertisement.
KROSS S.A. v. Vijay Munjal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s application to amend pleadings after trial commencement, holding that the mandatory proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC requires due diligence which was not demonstrated.
Kiran Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that minority aided schools have autonomy under Article 30(1) to appoint qualified teachers without State interference on evaluation criteria, and appointments are deemed approved if not disapproved within prescribed time.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Karamvir Singh
The Delhi High Court and Labour Court rightly held that the DTC failed to prove misconduct in departmental enquiry, and the High Court's limited supervisory jurisdiction precludes interference with factual findings absent perversity.
Matloob Ahmad & Anr. v. Indian Islamic Cultural Centre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit under Section 92 CPC is maintainable against a public charitable society for mismanagement, appointed a Court Observer to manage the society's affairs, and restrained the incumbent President from interfering.
Aakash Engineers & Contractors v. Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition to the NCLT, holding that early-stage winding up proceedings should be adjudicated by the NCLT, especially where arbitration has been invoked.
IFCI Factors Ltd. v. Asian Resources Ltd.
The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition to the NCLT under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that early-stage winding up proceedings must be adjudicated by the NCLT in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Taleda Square Private Limited v. Rail Land Development Authority
Delhi High Court held that a restrictive panel of arbitrators offered by one party violates arbitration principles and appointed an independent arbitral tribunal to ensure impartiality.
S.I Chander Kanta v. Rakesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court granted leave to appeal to the State against the acquittal of the accused under Sections 6 POCSO Act and 366 IPC, admitting the appeal for final hearing based on the prosecutrix's identification.
Manish Kumar Choudhary v. Pallavi Garg
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting withdrawal of a defective matrimonial petition with liberty to file afresh, setting aside the Family Court's rejection order.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that claims extinguished by an approved insolvency resolution plan are non-arbitrable, dismissing IOCL's petition to constitute an arbitral tribunal for disputes under a terminated gas supply agreement.
Orient Electric Limited v. Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit and counterclaim by recording a settlement agreement resolving all disputes over registered fan designs and ordered refund of court fees.
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. PURO WELLNESS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that Puro Wellness's commercial promoting its rock salt does not disparage Tata's white salt and refused to grant an injunction, affirming that truthful comparative advertising highlighting product attributes is permissible under Indian law.
CORNING SAS-INDIA BRANCH OFFICE v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Tribunal's remand order in a transfer pricing dispute as the TPO's subsequent order negated the need for adjustment, rendering the appeal infructuous.
Om Prakash v. Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
Delhi High Court allowed appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by adopting minimum wages for a minor deceased and awarding additional damages for loss of consortium, estate, and funeral expenses.
Sandeep Lamba v. Dimple Mahna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a judgment debtor seeking recall of attachment of immovable property, holding that non-cooperation in valuation and successive frivolous objections cannot stall execution proceedings.
Sri Aurea Aviation Pvt Ltd and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of existing Ground Handling Agencies following completion of the 2018 Regulations' tender process, dismissing claims of vested rights and fundamental rights violations.
CORNING SAS-INDIA BRANCH OFFICE v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
The Delhi High Court closed the appeal against the Tribunal's remand order in a transfer pricing case after the Transfer Pricing Officer recomputed adjustments and the appellant chose not to pursue the grievances further.