Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Group 4 Security Guarding Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, affirming that provident fund contributions under the EPF Act are limited to basic wages excluding various allowances, consistent with the Supreme Court's binding ruling.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Samhlo and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition directing withdrawal of attachments against the petitioner upon deposit of the ordered amount, while allowing verification of additional claimed sums.
Ashwin Murli v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging ONGC's medical disqualification policy for hearing-impaired candidates below 40% disability, holding that the court cannot direct policy amendments under its writ jurisdiction.
Miss A through Guardian v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing recall of a child witness for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., balancing the accused's right to a fair trial with the POCSO Act's protection against repeated testimony.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4 v. GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the Tribunal's order for AY 2009-10, relying on binding precedent from a coordinate bench in Rampgreen Solutions.
Arun Khanna v. ITO, Ward 63(1) New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under the new regime post Finance Act 2021 where identical allegations had already culminated in an assessment order under the old regime without any addition.
Varun Yadav v. Department of Women and Child Development Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging non-renewal of a contractual government service, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Heena & Ors. v. Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that in motor accident claims, income of a deceased holding a licence for skilled work should be assessed based on minimum wages for skilled workers, modifying the compensation accordingly.
CORNING SAS-INDIA BRANCH OFFICE v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
The Delhi High Court closed the appeal against the Tribunal's remand order in a transfer pricing case after the TPO recomputed adjustments with no significant impact, rendering the grievances infructuous.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. MRS SUMAN & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer who pays compensation in a motor accident claim is entitled to recover the amount from the vehicle owner if the driver lacked a valid licence and vehicle documents, and the owner fails to prove otherwise.
Dinesh Mittal & Ors. v. M/S Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed execution of sale deeds in favor of flat allottees by the Official Liquidator and ZION, safeguarded interests of purchasers in a winding up proceeding, and restrained sale of land claimed by a company under insolvency resolution pending adjudication.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences v. Pravesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing AIIMS to reconsider the respondent's promotion from 2006 based on corrected ACR grading, dismissing AIIMS's challenge.
Arti Srivastava v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order and refused to stay the transfer despite the petitioner’s plea based on her children’s academic session, holding that delay and laches do not bar writ petitions but personal grounds cannot indefinitely delay joining the posting.
Anil Dutt Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s writ petition seeking quashment of FIR and criminal proceedings as an abuse of process, affirming that no interference is warranted absent substantial questions of law.
S. S. Industries v. Pavan Kumar Gupta Trading as Vapnr Traders
The Delhi High Court held that ex parte seizure orders under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC require prior opportunity to the defendant and allowed use of seized machinery pending interim injunction decision.
Neelam Malik v. DSSSB and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s dismissal of a candidate’s claim to appear in Tier-II Examination after failing to secure minimum qualifying marks in Tier-I as prescribed in the recruitment advertisement.
KROSS S.A. v. Vijay Munjal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s application to amend pleadings after trial commencement, holding that the mandatory proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC requires due diligence which was not demonstrated.
Kiran Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that minority aided schools have autonomy under Article 30(1) to appoint qualified teachers without State interference on evaluation criteria, and appointments are deemed approved if not disapproved within prescribed time.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Karamvir Singh
The Delhi High Court and Labour Court rightly held that the DTC failed to prove misconduct in departmental enquiry, and the High Court's limited supervisory jurisdiction precludes interference with factual findings absent perversity.
Matloob Ahmad & Anr. v. Indian Islamic Cultural Centre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit under Section 92 CPC is maintainable against a public charitable society for mismanagement, appointed a Court Observer to manage the society's affairs, and restrained the incumbent President from interfering.