Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sunita Bansal and Anr v. Rajan Bansal
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that res judicata and ownership claims require evidence and cannot be decided at the threshold.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Chandrawati
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying Uttar Pradesh minimum wages for loss of dependency, enhancing medical expenses based on credible payment proof, and awarding loss of consortium, thereby reducing the total compensation.
Mritunjay (Legal Cell) Air Force v. GP Capt Ashutosh Vyas Retd
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force officer, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are attributable to service unless rebutted by positive medical evidence.
Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh v. Daya Ram
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order granting pay scale and pension revision to a retired employee treated as a direct recruit, rejecting the government’s belated attempt to reclassify his appointment as promotional.
Rajeev Kumar v. Govt. of NCT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging the answer key for a recruitment exam question, directing re-evaluation and appointment of the petitioner if eligible, while limiting the relief to avoid reopening the entire selection process.
Union of India and Another v. Balister Singh Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order restoring the third MACP benefit effective from 2012, affirming the applicability of MACP Scheme Illustration 28 and rejecting retrospective application objections.
Tejinder Singh v. Beverley Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s refusal to record evidence via local commissioner or video conferencing in matrimonial proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of respondent’s consent and medical incapacity for such relief.
Prem Nath Malhotra v. Nalini Kohli
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that unsupported claims on land use and tenant's age do not justify resisting eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Anju Khosla v. Income Tax Officer Ward 15 1 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices issued beyond the limitation period for AY 2015-16, holding that TOLA does not apply and such notices are invalid.
Jagdish Singh; Rohit Dabas; Amit Dabas v. Union of India; Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Lt. Governor of Delhi; Govt. of India; Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the writ petition directing payment of compensation with statutory interest to petitioners for land possession taken under a 2005 Award, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Union of India v. Air Cmde Ram Pratap Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting writ review to errors of law.
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. Vinod Singh Negi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that electricity connections may be granted or continued in unauthorized constructions pending MCD action, with mandatory disconnection upon MCD's intimation of demolition or sealing.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sgt Satyavir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting writ interference to errors of law.
Major Anish Murlidhar v. Col Anirudha Nath
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting its review to errors of law.
Mukesh Khanna v. Des Raj Jewellers
The High Court held that review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is limited and cannot be used to reappraise evidence or substitute the original order, setting aside the review allowed by the Additional Rent Controller and restoring the eviction order.
Kavita Devi v. Baljeet Singh
The Delhi High Court enhanced the maintenance awarded to a wife under Section 125 CrPC after correctly assessing the parties' incomes and reaffirming the husband's absolute duty to maintain his wife regardless of her earning capacity.
Namit Arora & Anr. v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of non-executive nominee directors in a corporate fraud case, holding that sufficient material existed to proceed and that exoneration by other agencies did not bar prosecution.
Mandava Ashapriya v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no novation occurred to extinguish the original loan debt, validating the dishonoured post-dated cheques and upholding criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act, while partially discharging a non-executive director for lack of specific allegations.
Akasaki Technology (P) Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The High Court held that jurisdictional issues regarding the validity of an assessment order under Section 144 must be decided by the appellate authority before remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer, setting aside the ITAT and CIT(A) orders and remanding the case for fresh adjudication.
Appellant v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a stepfather for repeated sexual assault of his minor stepdaughter, affirming that a child victim's consistent statements and corroborative medical evidence suffice to sustain conviction despite hostile cross-examination and absence of forensic evidence.