Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S SAI ALUMINIUM EXIM v. PR COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NORTH DELHI
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of GST registration for lack of reasons and procedural fairness, allowing the petitioner to submit documents for revocation.
VAB APPAREL LLP v. COMMISSIONER, DELHI GST AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration due to lack of specific allegations and premature order, emphasizing the need for clear reasons and procedural fairness.
Mahipal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld its earlier judgment declaring illegal amendments and appointments in the Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India and dismissed the review petition challenging the recovery of financial benefits from the illegally appointed President.
Skypower Solar India Private Limited v. Sterling and Wilson International FZE
Delhi High Court upheld interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act directing appellants to furnish bank guarantee securing disputed claims, applying principles analogous to Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC.
Asian Paints Limited v. Ajeet Kumar and Others
Delhi High Court recalled suspension of domain registrar's services for non-compliance after apology and corrective steps, imposing costs and appointing a grievance officer to ensure future compliance.
M/S PHENIL SUGARS LTD. v. LAXMI GUPTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a company may refuse registration of share transfers on bona fide grounds including mala fide intentions and conflict of interest, interpreting 'sufficient cause' under Section 111A(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 broadly to protect corporate interests.
Arcelormittal Nippon Steel India Limited v. GAIL (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim injunction to restrain termination of an LNG supply contract and to compel supply, holding no prima facie case for relief as the petitioner had accepted excess deliveries and damages were an adequate remedy.
Northern India Paint Colour and Varnish Co. LLP v. Sushil Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court upheld summoning orders in Section 138 NI Act complaints, holding that inquiry under Section 202 CrPC can be conducted via affidavit evidence without detailed debt determination at the summoning stage.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Archna Deo & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by adjusting income after tax, reducing future prospects and non-pecuniary damages, upheld interest rate, and rejected contributory negligence claim against the deceased.
Kusum Singh v. Union of India
Delhi High Court set aside rejection of compassionate allowance claim and remitted the matter for reconsideration in accordance with CCS (Pension) Rules and judicial precedents.
M/s Sweta Estate Pvt.Ltd. Gurgaon v. Haryana State Pollution Control Board & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld prosecution approval linked to ex-post facto Consent to Establish and restricted the tribunal from deciding issues beyond the appeal's scope.
Savita Shrimant Ghule v. Sangita Bibhishan Sanap
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a 'Motion of No Confidence' against a Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch, ruling that procedural defects do not invalidate the motion if statutory requirements are met and defects do not affect the merits.
Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society Ltd v. Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that unilateral amendments reducing essential parking amenities for a commercial mall without consent violate planning laws and public interest, quashing such amendments and restoring original parking provisions.
Ramesh Sitaldas Dalal v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR and chargesheet against the petitioners in a matrimonial dispute, holding that allegations did not prima facie constitute offences and that freezing of their bank accounts was arbitrary and illegal.
Danish Ali Jamaluddin Ahmed v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court allowed bail to an approver who complied with pardon conditions, balancing statutory detention mandates with constitutional liberty rights and witness protection laws.
Tarun Kumar v. Parmanand Garg
The Delhi High Court held that in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act, the landlord’s bona fide requirement for his wife’s business premises must be presumed genuine, and the tenant cannot challenge the validity of the landlord’s marriage or the suitability of alternate accommodation without cogent evidence.
M/S BLJ Resources and Chemicals Pvt Ltd v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to cross-examine the defendant's witness despite prior closure by the trial court, subject to payment of costs and strict compliance to avoid undue delay.
Shamshuddin v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the NDMC to complete the preparation of the mandatory street vending plan under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 in a time-bound manner, disposing of the writ petition on the assurance that the process is underway.
Ranjana Seth v. Prem Rani Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to allow belated summoning of a witness and production of a sale deed, holding that such late attempts to introduce evidence constitute abuse of process.
BOSCH LIMITED v. MR. ABHAY KUMAR JHA TRADING AS ELKOSTA SECURITY SYSTEMS INDIA
The Delhi High Court rejected the defendant's leave to defend in a summary suit for unpaid invoices, holding the suit within limitation and granting the plaintiff principal amount with reasonable interest.