Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dipak Bhattacharyya v. National Board of Accreditation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging non-empanelment with NBA, holding that no error apparent on record justified review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Invent Assets Securitization and Reconstruction Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 21 of the RDB Act, a pre-deposit for an appeal must be 50% of the debt amount adjudicated against the appellant specifically, not the total debt, and directed the DRAT to consider the petitioner’s appeal on this basis.
Citibank N.A. & Anr. v. Kuldeep Singh Dabas
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross appeals by enforcing a mutually agreed Settlement Agreement resolving all disputes between Citibank N.A. (now Axis Bank Limited) and Kuldeep Singh Dabas.
Mahesh Mathuradas Ganatra v. Centralised Processing Center & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the revenue cannot recover more than 20% of the tax demand before stay adjudication and directed refund of excess amount adjusted against the demand, emphasizing timely disposal of tax appeals.
e/; çns'k jkT; v. ihfM+r
The court upheld the State's petition to initiate criminal proceedings against the respondent for unauthorized possession of government property and non-compliance with official orders, emphasizing lawful exercise of authority and procedural compliance.
f2ab6eeebf8df134e52018b71ef4f0061eddf58c8a9cb68e24e92e7e6dd9f236
The court held that the petitioner proved the authenticity of documents and entitlement to recovery under Section 411 IPC, dismissing the respondent's conspiracy defense and allowing the appeal.
DCW Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment beyond four years is impermissible where the assessee has fully disclosed material facts and the reopening is based on mere change of opinion.
Asif Shaikh v. The Commissioner of Police Mumbai City
The Bombay High Court quashed the petitioner’s preventive detention under the MPDA Act due to the State Government’s failure to consider his representation, violating Article 22(5) rights.
Swapan Nripesh Bhattacharya v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking further investigation and transfer of the case concerning the suicide of Soham Bhattacharya, holding that the police investigation was thorough and complete.
Sheezan Mohd. Khan v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the application to quash charges under Section 306 IPC, holding that the allegations and material disclose a prima facie case of abetment of suicide requiring trial.
Swararaj @ Raj Shrikant Thackeray v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court held that a notice under Section 149 Cr.P.C is not an order promulgated under Section 188 IPC and that cognizance of such offence requires a written complaint under Section 195(1)(a) Cr.P.C, quashing the prosecution for non-compliance.
Shri Sudhakar Yashwant Warule v. The Gramsevak, Group Gram Panchayat Rasegaon
The Bombay High Court held that strict compliance with statutory procedure for resignation of Upa-Sarpanch is mandatory and set aside orders accepting a disputed resignation lacking proper acknowledgment, reinstating the petitioner.
Shabana Praveen v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking production of a missing minor, directing police to continue investigation and file quarterly status reports, finding that adequate search efforts were underway.
Umesh Kumar v. The N.C.T/Govt. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition regarding a missing wife directing continued police investigation with quarterly status reports to the magistrate.
Shivdevi v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking production of a missing girl, directing continued police investigation with periodic status reports but declined to issue a Habeas Corpus order due to lack of conclusive evidence.
Sumangli Gupta v. L.R. Gupta, HUF & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a partition suit with liberty to pursue claims for refund of interest-free security and property tax outside the suit, holding that claims not included in a settlement cannot be agitated in the same suit.
Reindodegracia Consultant Pvt Ltd v. Diasys Diagnostics India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a defendant's application seeking return of plaint for non-compliance with mandatory pre-institution mediation, holding that suits filed before 20.08.2022 with an application for urgent interim relief are exempt from Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Narender Kumar & Anr v. Rameshwar Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed modification of an arbitral award in terms of a lawful family settlement executed by the parties and permitted substitution of legal heirs following the respondent's death.
Surinder Kaur v. Ashok Kumar Bhakri
The Delhi High Court directed the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously dispose of a pending appeal, emphasizing the petitioner's age and undertaking to avoid unnecessary adjournments.
Shri Colonizers and Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Abha Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award begins only upon delivery of the signed award copy to the party itself, not merely to its counsel or in allied proceedings.