Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Naresh Aggarwal & Ors. v. Virender Dhaka & Ors.
The High Court granted a final opportunity to the defendants to cross examine a witness subject to costs and strict conditions, emphasizing timely conduct and expeditious disposal of the suit.
Shri Chintan Bindra v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee cannot be held liable for tax deducted at source but not deposited by the employer, setting aside demands and refund adjustments raised on that basis.
Satish Mohan Agarwal v. Sanjeev Kumar Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and transferred the suit back to itself from the Trial Court, holding that the suit could proceed from the stage of return despite pecuniary jurisdiction issues, subject to payment of proper court fees.
Chand Suraj v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition directing the petitioner to be considered under the general category for recruitment despite EWS certificate timing issues, emphasizing merit-based selection.
Hitesh Chhabra & Anr. v. Sandeep Chhabra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals to direct an interim arrangement for cheque signing in a family partnership dispute under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to maintain business operations pending arbitration.
Burger King Company LLC v. Ranjan Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared 'BURGER KING' a well-known trademark, confirmed injunction against defendants' use of the mark, and approved a settlement permitting defendants' use of 'BURGER EMPEROR' marks.
Burger King Company LLC v. Virendra Kumar Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declared 'BURGER KING' a well-known trademark, confirmed injunction against infringing use by defendants, and approved a settlement restricting defendants from using the mark while permitting use of 'BURGER EMPEROR'.
Avtar Singh Kochar @ Dolly v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under MCOCA, holding that reasonable grounds must exist to deny bail and that retracted confessions are to be examined at trial, balancing statutory provisions with fundamental rights.
Avinash Rastogi v. Bhupesh Khullar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place relevant manufacturer invoices on record at a late stage, holding that relevant corroborative documents can be admitted before evidence recording begins despite initial non-filing.
Avtar Singh Kochar v. Enforcement Directorate
Delhi High Court granted bail to a 69-year-old accused hawala operator in a money laundering case under PMLA, emphasizing broad probabilities and constitutional rights over detailed evidence at bail stage.
Christian Ifeanyichukwu @ Duru Christian v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a foreign national accused of serious fraud and cheating offences, holding that unauthorized stay and risk of fleeing justice justify denial of bail despite chargesheet filing and co-accused granted bail.
Vinay Kumar Verma & Anr. v. Harjit Singh Shah
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend in an eviction petition, holding that ownership persists until physical possession by the government under land acquisition, and triable issues on tenancy and ownership require trial.
Canara Bank v. M/s. Surekha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court ordered dissolution of M/s Surekha Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Official Liquidator due to absence of assets and completion of winding up.
Hema Gusain v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act cannot continue against a firm or deceased member, and upheld ICAI's closure of the complaint following the death of the responsible partner.
Punit Kotia v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that the serious allegations and corroborated eyewitness evidence preclude bail at this stage.
M/S SRI GANESH ENGINEERING WORKS v. NORTHERN RAILWAY & ANR.
Delhi High Court held that an arbitration appointment procedure allowing one party to appoint 2/3rd of arbitrators from a restricted panel violates party autonomy and impartiality, directing appointment of an independent sole arbitrator.
Mahesh Namkeen Pvt. Ltd. v. Patola Industries and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the prior user Plaintiff restraining Defendants from using the mark 'MAHESH' after cancellation of Defendants' trademark registrations and ordered withdrawal of conflicting applications.
Mr. Maahi Neil Jaipal v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the University of Delhi is not mandatorily required to reserve seats for foreign national students in the integrated law courses for 2023-24, dismissing the petition challenging the absence of such quota.
Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital Management v. Preeti
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's order recalling the closure of the petitioner's right to file a written statement subject to costs and affirmed the lawful imposition of costs for adjournment, dismissing the petition under Article 227.
Wipro GE Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a tender bid for failure to submit mandatory Manufacturer's Authorization and non-compliance with Public Procurement Orders restricting bids linked to countries sharing a land border with India.