Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mukesh Kumar v. Mohd. Jamal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition challenging the exclusion of the Custodian of Enemy Property as a party in eviction proceedings, holding that absolute ownership is not required to be proved and the Custodian is not a necessary party under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Anjuri Kumari v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Magistrate's discretion to order police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C must be exercised judiciously and the High Court will not interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C after dismissal of revision petition unless there is miscarriage of justice or abuse of process.
Rajinder Khurana v. Imperia Wishfield Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the State Consumer Commission to expedite disposal of a pending consumer complaint by granting a final opportunity to the respondent to file evidence and fixing a date for final hearing.
M/S M.S. Contractor v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration appointment procedure restricting party choice to a limited panel and allowing one party to appoint two-thirds of arbitrators violates principles of impartiality and party autonomy, and appointed an independent sole arbitrator.
Shri Ramesh Kumar Challya v. Smt. Laxmi
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's appeal holding that the tenancy was not protected under the Rent Control Act, the rent was Rs. 6500 per month as proved by a signed document and expert evidence, and the suit for possession and arrears was maintainable and deserved to be decreed.
Bhanu Mohan Kaila v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee cannot be held liable for tax deducted at source but not deposited by the employer, and barred recovery proceedings against the petitioner under Section 205 of the Income Tax Act.
Vijay Kumar Agarwal v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside a mechanically issued non-bailable warrant against the petitioner, emphasizing the need for judicious exercise of discretion balancing personal liberty and public interest.
Gulshan @ Aman v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused involved in armed robbery with criminal antecedents, as the serious nature of allegations and pending trial stage did not warrant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Rahul Shah v. Anubhav Gupta
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Sessions Court order setting aside summons against a partner not shown to be responsible for the firm's business under Section 138 read with Section 141 NI Act.
Manmohan Singh v. Arjun Uppal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that landlords' bona fide requirement for running a restaurant was genuine and no triable issue was raised by the tenant.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Klaxon Trading Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision setting aside the PCIT's revisionary order under Section 263, holding that the AO had conducted adequate enquiry into unexplained cash deposits before passing the original assessment order.
Sarina v. Koshlinder Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging visitation rights granted to the respondent, upholding supervised visitation without physical contact to protect the child's welfare amid POCSO allegations.
Dr Harvinder Singh v. Manjeet Kaur Sahni & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the appointment of the maternal grandmother as guardian of a minor in succession proceedings, upholding the trial court's order and allowing the petitioner to contest natural guardianship rights separately.
Trikkur Venkatachalam Radhakrishnan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an elderly accused in a serious property fraud case, emphasizing that bail is the norm and custody the exception when investigation is complete and there is no risk of evidence tampering.
Kuldeep Singh v. CBI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a multi-crore EPFO fraud case after considering the completion of investigation, lack of direct evidence, and bail granted to the main accused.
Reliable Tyre Market v. Arjun Uppal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, ruling that no permission under the Slums Act is required and bald tenant denials do not raise triable issues.
Raj Singh v. Satya Pal Singh
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit additional evidence under Section 391 Cr.P.C., affirming that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and that the application was a belated attempt to delay justice.
Narinder Arora through Legal Heirs v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a legal heir authorized by others through a valid General Power of Attorney can maintain an application under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC without individual affidavits, setting aside the dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution and restoring the appeal.
Sunanda Ayare v. Principle Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that removal of vehicles over 15 years old complies with pollution control orders but must follow scrapping procedures; unauthorized removal from private parking without procedure is impermissible, directing release of vehicle if not scrapped.
Beena Gupta v. S. Vipin Singh Chadha
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a commercial suit subject to costs and strict compliance to ensure expeditious trial, setting aside the Trial Court's order dismissing the application.