Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Global Health Care Products v. Krantikari Kamgar Union
The Bombay High Court held that closure without statutory permission is illegal, entitling named retrenched workmen to reinstatement and benefits, but the Industrial Tribunal cannot grant relief beyond the parties named in the industrial dispute reference.
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. Jaipur IPL Cricket Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Tribunal's reduction of FEMA penalties on IPL franchise promoters, emphasizing the necessity of mens rea and proportionality in penalty imposition under FEMA.
Neo Builder and Developers v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
The Bombay High Court partly allowed the developers' appeal, restricting their liability to pay transit rent until issuance of Occupancy Certificate and directing tenants to accept offered alternate accommodation, while modifying the injunction on alienation of flats.
T.R. Srinivasan and Ors. v. Indira Gandhi National Open University and Ors.
The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum correcting typographical errors in party references in its earlier judgment to ensure accuracy and clarity.
EMIL LUX GMBH AND CO. KG v. THE SENIOR EXAMINER, TRADEMARKS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's multi-class trademark application for 'LUX' to proceed for advertisement with restrictions to avoid conflict with existing marks, recognizing global registrations and proposed use basis.
Laxmi v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus for a missing boy, directing continued police investigation with periodic status reports.
HDFC Bank Limited v. Commissioner of Value Added Tax, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that penalty under Sections 86(10), (14), and (15) of the Delhi VAT Act requires proof of false or deceptive conduct and cannot be imposed merely due to a debatable tax liability, quashing the penalty imposed on HDFC Bank for sale of repossessed vehicles.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1 v. Anand Divine Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of disallowance of management fees paid to ATS by Anand Divine Developers, holding that sufficient documentary evidence discharged the onus on the assessee and the revenue failed to prove the fees were excessive or unreasonable.
KC India Test Laboratories v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging DDA's empanelment of labs within Delhi, holding the decision was a valid administrative exercise and the petition was a disguised PIL lacking locus standi.
Shyam Sunder Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of assessment under Section 153A requires incriminating material found during search, and in absence thereof, set aside the addition of undisclosed foreign income against the appellant.
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-3 v. SH. SHYAM SUNDER JINDAL
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's rectification order deleting the addition of notional interest income due to lack of material evidence, affirming the Tribunal's power under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Body Cupid Pvt Ltd v. MS VBRO Skincare Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions restraining defendants from infringing the 'WOW' trademark and trade dress and directed e-commerce platforms to remove infringing listings, allowing exemption from pre-litigation mediation due to urgency.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 8 v. M/S Sony India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order rejecting upward adjustment of AMP expenses reimbursement, holding that the Bright Line Test was improperly applied and the respondent was adequately compensated at arm's length.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax)-1 v. Godaddy.com LLC
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) where the taxability of domain registration income as royalty was a debatable issue pending judicial determination.
Mohd. Sattar through LRs v. Mohd. Ashfaq and Ors.
Delhi High Court stayed eviction order subject to petitioner’s undertaking to pay monthly charges and vacate premises by agreed date, disposing of the petition on settlement terms.
Shalini Gola v. Anand Goyal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging ex-parte orders, holding that the defendant's right to file a written statement was forfeited due to inaction despite due service and that negligence of previous counsel without due diligence does not justify setting aside ex-parte orders.
Reema Salkan v. Sumer Singh Salkan
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s closure of the petitioner’s right to further cross-examination and refusal to allow rebuttal evidence, granting only a final limited opportunity to cross-examine subject to strict conditions.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Prasoon Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of rash and negligent driving and inclusion of allowances in income but reduced future prospects from 15% to 10% for a fixed salary employee aged 53, modifying the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim.
Pratima Tyagi v. Commissioner of G.S.T & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without reasons and opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and directed cancellation to take effect only from the date the petitioner ceased business.
Vijay Singh v. Sher Singh
The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide afresh the applicability of the Delhi Rent Control Act to the disputed premises, holding that a new factual issue cannot be raised for the first time in revision without prior pleading and evidence.