Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dharam Bir v. Charan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's appointment of a Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to measure disputed property walls, ruling it a proper exercise of judicial discretion to elucidate factual controversies without delegating judicial functions.
Harmohinder Singh v. Joginder Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed refund of excess court fee paid in a partition suit but held that only one joint decree can be drawn, dismissing the request for separate decrees.
M/S ANTRIKSH ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. SH. BRAHAM PRAKASH YADAV & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit disclosed a cause of action and was within limitation as per the plaint's averments.
Amarjeet Malik v. DDA & Others
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to recall dismissal of restoration application for non-appearance due to unavoidable circumstances and restored the original suit for adjudication.
Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary v. Mahesh Bagchandka & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the complaint alleging encroachment was civil in nature, the petitioner lacked locus standi, and had abused the court process by concealing prior litigations.
Sunil Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed petition challenging disqualification and vacancy count in ITBP Head Constable recruitment, holding candidates must meet cut-off and cannot claim more vacancies than advertised.
Vijay Gupta and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable and voluntary settlement between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Anupam Singh Gautam & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Purushottam Sahu v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 304B IPC, holding that serious offences affecting societal interests cannot be quashed merely on the basis of compromise between parties.
Harkesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 509, 354, and 506 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Fawadullah Khan @ Fawabullah Khan & Others v. State (NCT) of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Sunil Ahuja v. Prem Ahuja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a bona fide family settlement between siblings as binding and enforceable, directing parties to comply with its terms and execute necessary documents.
MS Preeti v. MS Mamta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court modified a consent order limiting use and occupation charges upon the petitioner's undertaking to vacate premises and clear dues, directing possession delivery with consequences for non-compliance.
Metenuo Kechu v. Divisht Kaushik
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against summary eviction for admitted rent arrears and tenancy termination, affirming the landlord's right to possession despite alleged non-compliance with pre-litigation mediation.
Murtaza Gheewala v. M/S Deewan Chand Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a review petition and upheld the closure of the defendant's right to file a written statement after 120 days, refusing to condone delay in filing the appeal.
Sumit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal from service of a CISF constable following a departmental enquiry that complied with procedural requirements and found the punishment proportionate to proven misconduct.
Santosh Kumar v. Director of Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing payment of salary arrears to a teacher appointed without strict compliance to recruitment rules, relying on admissions and adverse inference against the school.
Rajesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused under the NDPS Act due to prolonged trial delay, holding that undue incarceration overrides the statutory bail restrictions under Section 37.
Smt. Ruma Kapoor v. Shri Gulshan Khullar & Others
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff was in lawful possession of the garage portion under the status quo order in a partition suit and dismissed applications for attachment and modification of the order as without merit.
Banwari Chaturvedi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified bail conditions to grant interim bail without upfront deposit, directing the petitioner to deposit a reduced amount within two months, clarifying the scope of bail conditions and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.