Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Virendra Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the non-revision of pension based on a separate E-9A pay scale, holding that pay fixation is a Government policy matter not subject to judicial interference.
Vikas Balguar @ Shammi v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a murder case due to hostile witnesses, long incarceration, and ongoing trial, emphasizing the balance between liberty and seriousness of offence.
Kanta Gupta v. Goverdhan Dass Daga LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act due to the landlord's concealment of vital facts negating bona fide requirement, affirming limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 25B(8).
Aparna Choudhrie Kala v. Vaibhav Kala
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's grant of leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that the defendant raised substantial defence and triable issues, and that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC does not permit reappraisal of such findings.
Senthilvelkumar v. State Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging FIR registration, holding that prior complaints and affidavit support satisfied Section 156(3) CrPC requirements and mala fide allegations do not warrant quashing at the investigation stage.
A.K. Al Muhaidib and Sons v. Chaman Lal Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the trademark "AL-WALIMAH" registered to respondent no.1 for non-use under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, holding that the petitioner was a person aggrieved and the mark was not bona fide used.
BABASAHEB v. RADHU VITHOBA BARDE
The Supreme Court held that specific performance of an agreement to sell tribal land to a non-tribal can be granted subject to obtaining prior government sanction under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code before actual conveyance.
Chatrapal v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the dismissal order based on perverse inquiry findings, and reinstated the Class IV employee with consequential benefits.
Kinjal Jayesh Mehta v. Disha Jimit Sanghvi
The Bombay High Court held that a married sister-in-law residing separately in her own matrimonial house does not have a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person under the D.V. Act and cannot be made a respondent in a domestic violence application.
Raviprakash Chaturdeo Patel v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that CIDCO was not obligated to accept the highest bid in its e-tender and that its rejection of the petitioner's bid was neither arbitrary nor unfair, dismissing the writ petition.
Shivraj Nagar Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. Mextech Realty Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that the statutory restriction on shareholding under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act does not apply to housing societies governed by Chapter XIII-B, and dismissed the petition challenging membership conferment to a company purchasing multiple bungalows.
Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order for non-filing of returns, restoring registration subject to compliance with filing and statutory rules.
Raghav Arora L/H of Sh. Gopal Kishan Arora v. GST Officer, Ward 78, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, modifying the cancellation date to the Show Cause Notice date instead of an earlier retrospective date.
Aditi Agencies v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to lack of reasons and opportunity to object, restoring the registration subject to compliance.
Dharam Bir v. Charan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's appointment of a Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to measure disputed property walls, ruling it a proper exercise of judicial discretion to elucidate factual controversies without delegating judicial functions.
Harmohinder Singh v. Joginder Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed refund of excess court fee paid in a partition suit but held that only one joint decree can be drawn, dismissing the request for separate decrees.
M/S ANTRIKSH ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. SH. BRAHAM PRAKASH YADAV & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit disclosed a cause of action and was within limitation as per the plaint's averments.
Amarjeet Malik v. DDA & Others
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to recall dismissal of restoration application for non-appearance due to unavoidable circumstances and restored the original suit for adjudication.
Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary v. Mahesh Bagchandka & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the complaint alleging encroachment was civil in nature, the petitioner lacked locus standi, and had abused the court process by concealing prior litigations.
Sunil Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed petition challenging disqualification and vacancy count in ITBP Head Constable recruitment, holding candidates must meet cut-off and cannot claim more vacancies than advertised.