Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sports Authority of India & Anr v. Dr. Kulbir Singh Rana
The Delhi High Court held that a counsel's concession recorded in court is binding and refused to recall an order disposing of writ petitions as withdrawn based on a claimed misunderstanding by counsel.
Bharti Cellular Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 57, Kolkata
The Supreme Court held that cellular service providers are not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194-H on payments to franchisees/distributors who are independent contractors, not agents.
Urban Infrastructure Trustees Ltd and Anr. v. Joyce Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court allowed amendments to plaints before trial commencement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, holding that such amendments clarifying admissions do not alter the cause of action and should be liberally permitted to ensure effective adjudication.
Mohan Velji Patel & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a delayed FIR alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC, holding that no prima facie offence was made out and the complaint was an abuse of process of law.
Nikhil Girish Patt; Ilesh Shah; Sooraj Kumar Tayade v. Central Bureau of Investigation; State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the trial court's power under Section 216 Cr.P.C. to add an aggravated forgery charge at the late stage of trial, dismissing the petitioners' challenge that such addition caused prejudice.
Pen Municipal Council v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Bombay High Court quashed PF assessment and attachment orders against Municipal Councils for non-payment of Contractors’ PF dues, directing fresh inquiry with proper summoning of Contractors and adherence to natural justice.
Chandrakant Dattu Mhatre & Ors. v. Nandkumar Moreshwar Patil & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition under Article 227 condoning a two-year delay in filing an application for restoration of an appeal, emphasizing the Court's supervisory jurisdiction to do substantial justice and protect the statutory right of appeal.
Abhishek Ajit Chavan v. Gauri Abhishek Chavan
The Bombay High Court dismissed the husband's writ petition challenging the Family Court's order denying modification of interim custody of the minor daughter, affirming that the child's welfare is paramount.
M/s. Visen Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane – II
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal against the Tribunal's order disallowing inadmissible Cenvat Credit availed without goods entering the factory and upheld recovery with penalty, holding no substantial question of law arose.
Harsh Mehta v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld SEBI's exemption of delisting pursuant to IBC-approved resolution plans from its Delisting Regulations, dismissing challenges to the regulation and related NCLT order as intra vires and consistent with insolvency law.
M/S EURO PVC FABRIC v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, SOUTH DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST registration cancellation order that was system generated, lacked reasons, and referred to a non-existent reply, restoring the petitioner's registration and emphasizing the need for application of mind and procedural fairness.
State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Mohd. Kasim @ Khan Saheb & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder and robbery case, holding that prior acquittal on firearms possession barred re-litigation and the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.
A TO Z PRODUCTIONS v. PRASAR BHARTI
The Delhi High Court held that an approval letter with conditions does not constitute a binding contract absent absolute acceptance and compliance with requirements, dismissing the petition for non-submission of documents and delay.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Sheela Devi & Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed insurance company's appeals holding it liable to pay compensation for a motor accident caused by rash driving despite seating capacity violation, affirming the Tribunal's award.
Sahil Sahni v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs against the petitioner under various IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Ishwar Chand Jain v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA’s failure to send allotment letter to the petitioner’s last known address invalidated cancellation of allotment, directing DDA to allot an equivalent flat at 1996 rates.
Aman Kumar Yadav v. State & Ors.
The Court held that an adult woman’s choice to live with her parents must be respected and dismissed the petition seeking her production and release.
Tapasi v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed recording of the minor victim's statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and custody determination by the Child Welfare Committee in a kidnapping and sexual assault case, disposing of the habeas corpus petition with these directions.
Suraj Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 302/34 IPC against the petitioner, holding that sufficient material existed to presume common intention at the charge framing stage.
Veena Khurana & Ors. v. Aman Verma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including medical expenses paid by the claimants, affirming that just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act includes all pecuniary damages incurred.