Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ajvender v. State Through SHO PS Binda Pur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the State to continue diligent investigation and file fortnightly reports to trace the petitioner’s missing minor daughter, disposing of the habeas corpus petition with supervisory directions.
Tek Chand v. State N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 398 IPC due to lack of identification and recovery evidence, holding that constructive liability under Section 34 IPC is insufficient to sustain such conviction.
Sujata Kohli v. Rajiv Khosla
The Delhi High Court dismissed a criminal contempt petition against an advocate for alleged courtroom disruption due to insufficient evidence and emphasized courts' powers to regulate proceedings.
Ikram Husain @ Akram Hussain & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage between the parties.
Satya Prakash Shrivastav & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Parvinder Singh @ Kallu @ Rinku v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder and robbery case due to doubts in prosecution’s circumstantial evidence and long incarceration without misuse of interim bail.
Vimal Tyagi v. Doli Tyagi
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of mental cruelty, holding that persistent harassment and disinterest by the wife justified dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Nalini Lal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Others
The Delhi High Court allowed respondents to place additional relevant documents on record at a belated stage under Order VII Rule 14 CPC, dismissing the petitioner’s objection and application for expungement, emphasizing a liberal approach to procedural rules to ensure substantial justice.
Parneet Singh Chawla & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354A, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sumit & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of the court process.
ANKUSH GARG AND ANR. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
M/S VAIDYA INDUSTRIES v. GOVT E MARKETING
The Delhi High Court held that an order of disablement by the GEM portal is not blacklisting or stigmatic and does not prejudice the appellant's rights in pending arbitration, allowing the appeal.
Raj Kumar v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement imposed on a bank officer, ruling that non-examination of borrowers in disciplinary inquiry did not violate natural justice and that judicial review under Article 226 does not permit reappreciation of evidence.
Millennium Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Footwear Design and Development Institute
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking termination of an arbitrator's mandate, holding that unilateral arbitration cannot proceed without judicial appointment when one party fails to nominate an arbitrator as per the contract.
Sports Authority of India & Anr v. Dr. Kulbir Singh Rana
The Delhi High Court held that a counsel's concession recorded in court is binding and refused to recall an order disposing of writ petitions as withdrawn based on a claimed misunderstanding by counsel.
Bharti Cellular Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 57, Kolkata
The Supreme Court held that cellular service providers are not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 194-H on payments to franchisees/distributors who are independent contractors, not agents.
Urban Infrastructure Trustees Ltd and Anr. v. Joyce Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court allowed amendments to plaints before trial commencement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, holding that such amendments clarifying admissions do not alter the cause of action and should be liberally permitted to ensure effective adjudication.
Mohan Velji Patel & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a delayed FIR alleging cheating under Section 420 IPC, holding that no prima facie offence was made out and the complaint was an abuse of process of law.
Nikhil Girish Patt; Ilesh Shah; Sooraj Kumar Tayade v. Central Bureau of Investigation; State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the trial court's power under Section 216 Cr.P.C. to add an aggravated forgery charge at the late stage of trial, dismissing the petitioners' challenge that such addition caused prejudice.
Pen Municipal Council v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Bombay High Court quashed PF assessment and attachment orders against Municipal Councils for non-payment of Contractors’ PF dues, directing fresh inquiry with proper summoning of Contractors and adherence to natural justice.