Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
DR GHANSHYAM CHOURASIYA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the government to consider the petitioner's claim for last increment and retirement benefits in light of binding Supreme Court rulings and dispose of it within six weeks.
Sushila Vel v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition on pay anomaly and seniority by directing the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks after hearing her.
M/s Lumax Auto Pvt Ltd v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court dissolved M/s Lumax Auto Pvt. Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 and discharged the Official Liquidator as winding up could not proceed due to lack of assets.
Ashok Mehra v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a rejected alternate plot allotment application after finding the Recommendation Committee failed to properly consider official acquisition records and the petitioner’s representation.
M/S Supreme Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective reasons and proper notice, and modified the cancellation date to the actual business closure date.
Three Ess Industries v. Commissioner of VAT and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to consider and decide the petitioner’s claim for statutory interest on delayed VAT refund under Section 42 of the DVAT Act, mandating payment or a reasoned order.
Delhi Development Authority and Anr. v. Surjit Singh and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing DDA to reckon the respondent's past MES service for pension and ACP benefits despite procedural formalities and an earlier undertaking.
State v. Rohit
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to failure of prosecution to prove the victim's minority and inconsistencies in her statements.
Bihar State Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation v. National Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral Award due to unilateral appointment of the Arbitrator without express written consent and lack of valid consent to the settlement, reaffirming strict compliance with Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act.
Commissioner of Police v. Meena Kumari
The High Court remanded dismissal without departmental enquiry under Article 311(2)(b) for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for objective reasons and judicial scrutiny before dispensing with enquiry.
Chandani v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that a major daughter living voluntarily with her husband cannot be compelled to return to her parents via habeas corpus petition.
Currymia Foods Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a company succeeding a sole proprietorship contractor must obtain fresh registration to supply meat to the Army, upholding removal of the predecessor for failure to notify change.
Gaurav Kumar v. Nirmal Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove rash and negligent driving by the truck driver and that the accident was caused due to the tractor trolley losing control, with contributory negligence by the appellant.
JAI OPTICAL v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of personal hearing.
M/S. Hardicon Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed service tax audit proceedings to continue but restrained enforcement of any final order pending adjudication of the validity of Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.
Ethos Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Department of Trade and Taxes & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to properly consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing.
RR BALAJI AD v. COMMISSIONER OF SGST DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective reasons with prior opportunity to the taxpayer, setting aside a mechanically passed retrospective cancellation order and restoring the petitioner’s registration.
Rajkumar Singhal v. The Goods and Services Tax Network
The Delhi High Court set aside a defective GST Show Cause Notice and related communication for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements including proper service under Rule 21A of the CGST Act.
G & S International v. Commissioner of Customs; Raj International v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of customs appeals for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, affirming that the right to appeal is conditional and non-deposit justifies rejection of the appeal.
Usha Rani v. Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in substitution of legal heirs under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC, set aside the abatement of suit, and directed the trial court to proceed with the case.