Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Lata Chhiber v. Registrar, Co-operative Societies
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the arbitral award and upheld the allotment of a Type 'B' flat to the petitioner, holding that she failed to prove entitlement to a Type 'A' flat.
Kimaya Lal Kidwai and Another v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed registration of a sale deed after quashing refusal orders based on outdated revenue records showing government occupancy despite quashing of acquisition proceedings.
Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Election Commission's rejection of allotment of a common election symbol, holding that the concession under para 10B(B) is available only twice cumulatively and that the petitioner failed to meet eligibility and procedural requirements.
APL Apollo Tubes Limited v. M/S Steel Track & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using deceptively similar 'APOLLO' marks on allied steel products, holding that trademark infringement and passing off were prima facie established and that the court had jurisdiction.
Abnash Chander Chadha v. Balbir Kumar Chadha & Anr.
The High Court allowed the petitioner's belated application to summon official records and witness for cross-examination under Order XIII Rule 1(3) CPC, emphasizing procedural rules must yield to substantial justice.
Abnash Chander Chadha v. Balbir Kumar Chadha & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to lead evidence in rebuttal under Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC, clarifying the procedural limits and conditions for exercising the right to rebuttal evidence in civil suits.
Darshan Jaiswal v. Northern Railways
The limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts only upon receipt of a signed copy of the award, and delay in filing can be condoned if such copy is not received.
AECOM ASIA COMPANY LIMITED v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The High Court permitted withdrawal of a petition related to arbitration proceedings while allowing the interim protection order to continue pending the arbitrator's decision on a Section 17 application.
M/S Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd v. Ms. Dolly Khurana & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from finance agreements containing valid arbitration clauses.
M/S N. J. Garments Private Limited v. M/S Capitalgram Marketing and Technology Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that failure to exhaust pre-arbitration friendly consultations does not render arbitration invocation premature if one party frustrates negotiations, and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.
Jilajeet Satyanarayan Pandey & Ors. v. Chandrabali Rajnarayan Shukla & Ors.
The Bombay High Court partly allowed the revision to modify an eviction decree based on bonafide requirement, ordering partial eviction where only one of the landlord's sons continued to need the premises.
Laxman v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that admission rights from a computerized draw of lots for EWS students are limited to the specific academic year and cannot be enforced after the year ends or carried forward without fresh application.
Sneha Sunil Patil v. Suhel Shaukat Shaikh
The Bombay High Court partly allowed the motor accident claim appeal, enhancing compensation by considering actual salary components, increasing future prospects, and awarding loss of domestic services to the legal heirs.
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. Interio Division v. Shivkranti Kamgar Sanghatana
The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's finding that certain employees performing manual and skilled work belong to the definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing the writ petition challenging their status.
MFE Formwork Technology SDN.BHD. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court quashed reopening notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2016-17, holding that reopening based solely on a set-aside Section 263 order and change of opinion is impermissible and lacks jurisdiction.
The Administrator Nashik, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. v. Sham Nariman Dumasia and Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the order directing the petitioner to pay enhanced compensation with interest for land acquired in 1982-83, dismissed the delayed review application, and ordered disbursement to claimants except those not entitled by law.
M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed penalty and royalty imposed under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code on earth excavated during a public sewerage project, holding that reuse of excavated earth on the same plot without commercial exploitation does not attract royalty liability.
Dentsu Network Advertising Private Limited v. Conceptual Pictures Worldwide Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a purchase order containing an arbitration clause, leaving the question of non-signatory joinder to the arbitral tribunal.
Pankaj Madaan v. HealthAssure Private Limited
The Bombay High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act despite a procedural error in the application, rejecting the Respondent's delay tactics and ordering costs.
Messe Frankfurt Trade Fairs India Pvt. Ltd. v. Netlink Solutions India Limited
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for breach of non-compete clauses due to petitioner’s delay, suppression of material documents, and insufficient evidence of respondents’ involvement.