Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Daksh Juber Ghelani v. The Commissioner of Police, Pune City
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unexplained delay in recording witness statements and issuing the order, breaking the causal link required for valid detention under the MPDA Act.
Divyaniben Ajaykumar Patel v. Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli Daman & Diu
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unexplained seven-month delay breaking the proximate link between alleged offence and detention, emphasizing the necessity of timely detention orders.
Rajesh Shantilal Sejpal v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
The Bombay High Court held that a head-on collision was due to composite negligence of both drivers, rejected the act of God defense, and awarded compensation with interest to the appellant's legal heirs.
Rahul Gorakhanath Kadam; Nilesh Shivaji Patil v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the exclusion of powerlifting from sports reservation under the 2016 Government Resolution, dismissing petitioners' claims based on promissory estoppel and Article 14.
Sandip Suresh Mali & Ors. v. Maharashtra Public Service Commission & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to the PSI recruitment process, holding that delayed challenges and interference in subsequent recruitments are impermissible under Article 226.
Sanjeev Malhotra v. SBI Global Factors Ltd. & Anr.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award upholding the guarantor's liability for enhanced credit facilities and rejecting delay and procedural objections.
Vandana Rana v. Manjeet Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial dispute case from Saket Courts to Dwarka Family Courts to ensure impartiality and consolidate related proceedings.
Ram Milan Yadav Gulba Devi Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate General of Training to inspect the petitioner’s institution and decide the affiliation application within a specified timeframe, addressing undue administrative delay.
M/S JAIN CEMENT UDYOG v. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order passed without hearing the petitioner who was unable to respond due to retrospective cancellation of GST registration, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Archit Khandelwal Proprietor M/s Archit Enterprises v. Pr. Commissioner of DGST Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and due process, modifying the cancellation date to when the petitioner ceased business.
M/S DEEP PLASTIC GRANULES TRADING COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a detailed response and directed the authorities to dispose of the GST cancellation Show Cause Notice after personal hearing, without deciding on merits.
Harinder Singh Butola v. Premier Security Services Pvt Ltd and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award dismissing the petitioner’s claim for reinstatement and back wages, holding no employer-employee relationship existed between the petitioner and respondents.
M/s Samrat Constructions Company v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the arbitral award's counter claim portion for lack of reasons and held that the limitation period for filing the Section 34 petition was extended by the Supreme Court's COVID-19 orders.
Sadhu Charan Datta v. The Delhi Safe Deposit Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a former Director who resigned before the cheque issuance, holding that mere directorship without control over company affairs is insufficient for liability.
Religare Finvest Limited v. Widescreen Holdings Private Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator had not terminated de jure or de facto and extended her mandate to complete arbitration proceedings, dismissing the petition for substitution.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. Reliance Industries Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the APTEL's order allowing Reliance Industries Limited's impleadment as a party with limited rights in appeals challenging PNGRB's declaration of ATF pipelines as common carriers, dismissing the appellants' challenge to the impleadment.
First Crush Cafe Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Amit Kumar Goyal
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act and set aside the summoning order due to attachment of an incorrect demand notice and lack of proper judicial scrutiny.
MS. RADHIKA S. ICHHPUNIANI & ANR v. M/S SUDVIN FINVEST FAIRDEALS (P.) LTD. & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed transfer of nascent winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT in accordance with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
First Crush Cafe Pvt. Ltd & Anr. v. Shubham Jain
The High Court quashed a cheque dishonour complaint and summoning order due to attachment of an incorrect statutory demand notice and lack of judicial scrutiny by the trial court.
Harish Verma v. Joginder Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a commercial suit plaint cannot be dismissed at the threshold for failure to comply with mandatory pre-litigation mediation without a thorough examination of whether the suit contemplates urgent interim relief.