Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Rahul Verma & Ors. v. State of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Ashok Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed transfer of investigation into the alleged kidnapping of a minor child to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit and mandated periodic status reports, disposing of the writ petition seeking production and custody of the child.
Pankaj Makhija v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 307 and 324 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the minor nature of injuries, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
M/S. MAGO CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator from the Ministry of Defence panel to adjudicate a contract payment dispute after directing parties to attempt amicable resolution.
Mohammed Moinuddin Ahmed v. Bhola Nath Singh
The Delhi High Court directed Hockey India to ensure transparency in State Selection Trials by mandating advance publication of trial details and accepted sending an independent observer as a one-time measure for senior men’s trials.
Vishwas Chopra v. Sheena Chopra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal and upheld the Family Court's order granting maintenance to the wife and child under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, condoning a six-day delay in filing the appeal.
Gyan Singh Meena v. National Seeds Corporation Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an employee following a departmental inquiry, holding that procedural fairness was observed, evidence was sufficient, and penalty was not disproportionate.
Amit Arora v. MMR Infrastructure Developers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition due to a bona fide dispute over payment liability, directing the petitioner to seek remedy through civil courts and allowing condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.
Ayush Agarwal v. M/S Dimensions Innovation Labs Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to absence of assets and inability to proceed with winding up.
Brilliance Educational Society and Ors. v. Karamvir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree based on clear admissions of tenancy under an unregistered rent agreement and valid termination notice, dismissing the appeal challenging the judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
State v. Bharat Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a case of alleged abetment to suicide and cruelty, holding that mere threats and minor beatings do not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC or cruelty under Section 498A IPC without proximate cause or direct instigation.
Adesh Tyagi v. Pooja Kaur
The Delhi High Court held that the 20% pre-deposit under Section 148 NI Act is not mandatory and must be considered in light of recovery already made, allowing suspension of sentence without rigid deposit conditions.
Joginder Pal Kaur and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken, even if compensation remains unpaid.
Winzo Games Private Limited v. Hike Global Pte. Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes between WinZO and Hike, limiting arbitration to parties to the agreement and excluding patent issues and certain respondents.
SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K S Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that summary judgment under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC is discretionary and cannot be granted where disputed factual issues exist, requiring the plaintiff to prove its claims by evidence despite the defendants' failure to file a Written Statement.
Akil Ahmed v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court waived the Rs. 10,000/- cost imposed on the petitioner for recalling a witness, considering his financial incapacity and commitment to avoid trial delays.
Sumit Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a rape case citing delay in FIR, consensual relationship, and pending trial, while imposing strict conditions to prevent tampering or intimidation.
Arun Mishra v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus for a missing person, directing continued police investigation with monthly status reports to the Magistrate.
Ajayraj Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Tax, GST, Delhi, East, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an order passed without considering the petitioner's reply to a GST show cause notice and directed fresh adjudication after granting personal hearing.
M/S ATSAR EXPORTS PVT LTD v. SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS AND ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to inspect, measure, and photograph a seized shawl in the presence of Customs officials, directing the authorities to facilitate such inspection while preserving parties’ rights.