Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mahender and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 323, 324, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that minor offences settled amicably may be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
PROTO DEVELOPERS AND TECHNOLOGIES LTD v. M/S ANTRIKSH REALTECH PVT LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allocating responsibility for statutory dues to the petitioner and respondent No. 2, dismissing the petition challenging the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sudhir Bidhuri v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest petition seeking action against alleged unauthorized construction due to lack of evidence and clarified that the disputed property was not subject to illegal construction.
Medifirm Pharmacy LLP v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging tender eligibility and turnover criteria for operating a Janaushadhi shop, holding the conditions reasonable and the petition barred by delay.
M/S SERVICES INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for lack of proper personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after allowing the petitioner to file a reply.
AL-KHAIR EXPORTS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ZONE 8, WARD 89
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a refund application for non-submission of documents, directing re-examination with opportunity for personal hearing and submission of additional evidence.
M/S ACE CARDIOPATHY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order due to improper service of a Show Cause Notice on the GST portal and directed a fresh opportunity for response and hearing.
N K Industries v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and procedural fairness, modifying the cancellation date to the Show Cause Notice date and setting aside retrospective cancellation without proper reasons.
Neeraj Ahuja v. AIPL Zorro Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order removing the written statement from record for procedural non-compliance and remanded the matter for reconsideration after hearing both parties.
Roadwings International Private Limited v. Container Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a Central Public Sector Enterprise covered under the Vivad Se Vishwas-II Scheme must settle claims arising from arbitral awards below Rs. 500 crore filed within the Scheme's timeline, and cannot retrospectively opt out to deny such claims.
Vandana Batra v. Anupam Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed defendant No. 1's application to amend his written statement to include additional properties for partition, holding that amendments should be liberally permitted at the nascent stage without deciding merits or limitation issues.
K Jeevan Rita Murthy v. Sarabjit Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking substitution as legal representative of the deceased defendant, holding that such substitution would impermissibly change the nature of the suit from possession to title determination without proof of the will's genuineness.
Yuva Sangharsh Samiti v. Vijay Kumar Dev & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that substantial compliance with its order to remove encroachments on Delhi Gate Qabristan land and initiation of eviction proceedings under the Waqf Act sufficed to discharge contempt, directing further action upon constitution of the Waqf Tribunal.
Sunil Kumar Saxena v. Dr M Balaji & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for alleged disobedience of its earlier judgment, holding that substantial compliance by respondents precludes contempt liability and directing the petitioner to challenge disputed pension adjustments through appropriate legal remedies.
Manish Tiwari & Ors. v. Amit Yadav, Chairperson, NDMC & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that respondents complied with earlier directions by initiating compassionate appointment procedures and directed completion within four months, disposing of the petition with liberty to revive on non-compliance.
Sharda Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to ascertain the existence of a water body and take expeditious action to remove encroachments on public land, emphasizing compliance with court orders and restoration of public resources.
Roshan Lal v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review petition seeking disability pension in addition to invalid pension, holding that such claim cannot be raised in review proceedings under Order XLVII CPC.
Sathy B Kumar v. Kerala Education Society Senior Secondary School
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s Hindi Shikshan Nishnat qualification is equivalent to M.Ed., entitling her to retrospective promotion to PGT (Hindi) from 2014 with consequential benefits.
Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors. v. Prakash Kumar Dixit
The Delhi High Court held that a Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable against contempt orders not imposing punishment, affirming that statutory remedies under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are exclusive for such appeals.
Dinesh Mittal & Ors. v. M/S Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Official Liquidator’s authority to sell TIDCO’s Sector 78 land and rejected allottees’ claims for flat allotment, affirming that asset sale and pari passu distribution among creditors is the proper course in winding-up proceedings.