Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Food Corporation of India v. MBR Silos Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that ICADR lacked jurisdiction to unilaterally appoint the presiding arbitrator without party consent and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Global Music Junction Pvt. Ltd. v. Annapurna Films Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a contempt application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC is maintainable only against a party restrained by the injunction, dismissed Defendant No. 6's contempt claim against the plaintiff for misrepresenting injunction orders, and directed the plaintiff to ensure accurate enforcement communications going forward.
Savitri Goel & Anr. v. Parvesh Arora
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing written statements beyond prescribed time under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 5 Limitation Act, emphasizing the court's discretion to secure justice in exceptional circumstances.
M/S RK GOYAL STEELS PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to dispose of the petitioner's delayed VAT refund claim within six weeks and comply with statutory interest provisions under Section 42 of the Delhi VAT Act.
Aashna Singhal v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year if not renewed, directing the bank to lift embargo on the petitioner's account.
Vaibhav Singhal v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year if not extended, directing the bank to restore operation of the petitioner's account.
Seema Gupta v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year if not extended, directing release of the petitioner's bank account embargo.
Shree Bankey Bihari Tarding Company v. Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade and Taxes and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, setting aside cancellation from a retrospective date and fixing it from the Show Cause Notice date.
Aashna Singhal v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year if not extended, directing release of the petitioner's bank account embargo.
Konica Singhal v. The Principal Commissioner of GST and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year unless renewed, and directed the bank to allow operation of the petitioner's account.
Sarthak Jha v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person with intellectual disability is entitled to PWD reservation in self-financing institutions under the DPCIA and quashed GGSIPU's denial of such reservation and cancellation of admission.
Manoj Rana v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing framing of charges under Sections 506, 509, and 34 IPC, holding that a prima facie case existed and the Trial Court erred in discharging the accused at the charge framing stage.
Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Private Limited v. Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the infringement of the registered trademark 'Liv.52' by the appellant's use of 'Liv-333', dismissing the appeal against permanent injunction while staying damages and costs pending deposit.
Pushyam Pandla & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the NTA to examine and decide the petitioners' grievances regarding question paper replacement during NEET UG-2024 within ten days, preserving their right to approach the court thereafter.
Anees v. The State Govt. of NCT
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, affirming that Section 106 Evidence Act applies where foundational facts are proved and the accused fails to satisfactorily explain facts especially within his knowledge.
Veeneta Gupta LRs v. Jyoti Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Respondent as sole Class-I heir is entitled to the estate under the Hindu Succession Act, and unregistered customary documents do not confer title or substitution rights to the Appellants.
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Sukhwinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to the accused in an NDPS case due to non-compliance with mandatory Section 52A procedures and prolonged incarceration, emphasizing the necessity of Magistrate-certified sampling for valid primary evidence.
Pawan Dhanpatrai Malhotra v. Mahender Khari
A single complaint under Section 138 NI Act for multiple cheques issued in a single transaction and covered by one notice is maintainable despite Section 219 Cr.P.C. limiting consolidation to three offences.
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST demand order for lack of proper adjudication and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after allowing the petitioner to file further reply and be heard.
Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited v. Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward 203 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed replies and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing and a speaking order.