Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SAARTHI AIRWAYS PVT LTD v. DR. B.M MISHRA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for alleged disobedience of demarcation orders, holding that demarcation is distinct from ownership and must be challenged in appropriate proceedings.
Sarabjeet Kaur v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings cannot examine the merits of administrative decisions taken pursuant to court orders and dismissed the petition alleging wilful disobedience after the respondent disposed of the representations.
Mamta Kumari & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed continuation of IVF treatment commenced before the ART Act's enforcement, holding that retrospective application of age restrictions violates reproductive autonomy under Article 21.
M/S Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging AAI's rejection of height clearance, holding that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appeal remedy before the Appellate Committee which will grant a personal hearing.
M/S JAI HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. v. TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the electricity supplier must remove its transformer installed on the plaintiff's property at its own cost and pay user charges, rejecting the supplier's claim for compensation and affirming the plaintiff's right to recover damages for unauthorized occupation.
Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Meera Devi v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from family disputes under Sections 323, 452, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Master Devansh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the right to admission under the EWS quota through a computerized draw of lots is limited to the relevant academic year and dismissed the petition filed after that year had ended, while directing alternate educational arrangements.
Yamin Ali v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the appointment of the Administrator of the Delhi Waqf Board, holding that the petitioner must utilize statutory remedies and that no prima facie ground existed to quash the appointment.
Petitioner/aggrieved woman v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed constitution of an Internal Complaints Committee and impleaded a delinquent director to ensure compliance with the POSH Act, emphasizing confidentiality and continuation of proceedings despite company winding up.
Rajiv Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against a nominee director solely for loan default, holding that without criminal proceedings, such restriction violates the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
KTECH ENGINEER BUILDERS CO. PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that blacklisting a contractor without a valid show cause notice and opportunity to be heard violates natural justice and quashed adverse remarks amounting to blacklisting against the petitioner.
Sumit v. The Principal VSPK International School and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning school admission after the respondent school agreed to convert the provisional admission into permanent admission.
Seema Dayal & Ors. v. Mala Mathur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court passed a preliminary decree for equal partition of a deceased's assets among his daughters as per a Will, appointing a Local Commissioner to assist in partition and maintaining status quo on immovable property.
Sushama Talegaonkar v. Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University
The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice based solely on delayed submission of experience certificate, without disputing qualifications, may be interfered with if prima facie illegal, and granted the petitioner limited protection pending final decision.
Devender Kumar Baral v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in minor offences.
Orris Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Saanvi Interiors India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable to challenge an MSMED Act arbitral award when statutory remedies under the Arbitration Act are available and unexhausted.
Binod Agarwal v. The CPIO and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging CIC's refusal to disclose attendance records, holding the information as personal and exempt under RTI Act and that the petition was not maintainable in Delhi due to lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Manju Tokas & Anr. v. GNCT of Delhi through Divisional Commissioner & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that authorities under the Senior Citizens Act lack jurisdiction to decide property title disputes and must proceed with eviction applications on merits to protect senior citizens, dismissing the petition challenging the appellate order.
OYO WORKSPACES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. OPTIMUM OVERSEAS CONSULTING SERVICES
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from unpaid dues under a commercial membership agreement.