Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pushpa Khanna & Anr. v. Sanjay Narang & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed reopening of evidence in an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that sub-letting to a subsequent tenant is covered by general pleadings and delay in producing evidence can be excused if discovered late due to circumstances beyond the party's control.
Ram Kishan v. M/S Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed Section 65B certificate for electronic evidence during ongoing trial proceedings, holding that non-filing is a curable procedural defect and technicalities should not impede justice.
Harjit Singh Sahni v. Sidhant Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant who voluntarily surrenders possession after an agreed extended period cannot seek restoration under Section 19(2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Primordial Systems Pvt. Ltd v. Raman Kumar Chug & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's partial rejection of belated documents under Order VII Rule 14 CPC due to lack of satisfactory explanation for delay and petitioner’s conduct.
Union of India v. ANS Construction Ltd
The Delhi High Court partly set aside an arbitral award by rejecting compensation for idling of resources due to lack of evidence, while upholding other claims including price escalation and delay attribution to the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Link Engineers (P) Limited v. M/S Asia Brown Boveri Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery under an alleged agreement, holding that liabilities transferred in a demerger and no valid joint venture existed with defendant No. 1, thus no enforceable contract or entitlement to payment arose.
Bindra Travel Line Pvt. Ltd. v. Sehwag International School
Delhi High Court partly allowed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of outstanding transportation service charges, holding that the contract was terminated unilaterally by the plaintiff and rejecting claims for increments and damages.
M/S. SOLOMAN ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on grounds of undervaluation, forgery allegations, or non-compliance with pre-institution mediation when these are disputed factual issues requiring evidence, and urgent interim relief exempts mediation.
Hem Manohar v. Rachna Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants as tenants forfeited their tenancy rights due to non-payment of rent and that the oral Agreement to Sell and General Power of Attorney did not confer ownership, granting possession to the plaintiffs.
Rohit Malhotra v. Gurvinder Singh Toor
The Delhi High Court held that the MoU for sale of shares was a binding contract enforceable by specific performance, rejected the defendant's COVID-19 force majeure termination, and granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Paminder Gujral; Neelu Chawla; Ranju Sayall v. Kiranjit Gujral; Rohun Gujral; Rahil Gujral
The Delhi High Court held that movable assets of a deceased who died intestate as to such assets devolve equally among legal heirs despite nominations, allowing judgment on admission for partition of movable assets under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Manju Bidhuri v. Jagwant Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a husband's relinquishment of his undivided share in a matrimonial home to his mother is valid and does not affect the wife's right of residence under the DV Act, dismissing the suit challenging the transfer.
Shri R.S. Chhabra v. Shri Gopal Krishan Kapoor and Others
The Delhi High Court held that third-party claims based on a subsequent Agreement to Sell cannot be raised in execution proceedings of a compromise decree and must be pursued through independent suits.
Union of India v. M/S ANS Construction Ltd
The Delhi High Court partly set aside an arbitral award by quashing compensation for idling of resources due to lack of evidence, while upholding other claims including price escalation and extra cement consumption, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Indira Television Ltd v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that disconnection of a television channel without mandatory three weeks' prior written notice under TRAI regulations is illegal and directed restoration of the channel's transmission pending TDSAT proceedings.
Rachana Television Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disconnection of a broadcaster's channel without mandatory prior notice under TRAI regulations and contractual terms is illegal and directed immediate restoration of the channel.
Deepak Duggal v. State
The Delhi High Court granted Probate of a 1985 Will excluding two daughters, holding it validly executed in sound mind without fraud or undue influence, and dismissed objections challenging its genuineness and validity.
Raj Shipping Agencies Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai
The Bombay High Court held that berth hire charges must be levied based on actual GRT as per binding TAMP clarification, quashing the port authority's demand notices and restraining enforcement.
Hershey India Private Limited v. Rajendra Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing the plaintiff to summon the defendant's employee as a witness and dismissed the petition challenging the summons, affirming the procedural and substantive rights to summon relevant evidence under Order XVI CPC.
Rajni Gupta v. Sanjay Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a summary judgment application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that no clear admission existed to deprive respondents of their right to trial on disputed ownership and possession issues.