Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Satyam Enterprises Prop. Hitesh Chugh HUF v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires specific reasons and cannot be imposed mechanically, setting aside retrospective cancellation in this case.
Nitin Jain & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Akram Saeed Khan @ Akram & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
M/S. ABHISHEK APPLIANCE PVT. LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST-DELHI NORTH COMMISSIONERATE & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for lack of fair hearing and independent application of mind, directing a fresh opportunity to the petitioner to respond.
Datta Power Infra Private Limited v. Solar Energy Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking issuance of LOA to the petitioner in a wind energy tender, holding that no vested right arises without acceptance of the tariff by buying entities and that pooled tariff was not applicable.
HT MEDIA LIMITED v. BRIGHTSTAR RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension of the learned Arbitrator's mandate under Section 29(A)(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to conclude arbitral proceedings despite partial settlement among parties.
Ajay Gupta & Anr. v. M/S Greenways
The Delhi High Court held that an open courtyard used for placing generator equipment does not constitute 'premises' under the Delhi Rent Control Act, and the Defendant is a permissive user, not a tenant, dismissing the Defendant's plea to reject the suit.
Harsh Dhanuka HUF v. Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITSC’s addition of undisclosed commission and margin money in off-market transactions, affirming the ITSC’s plenary jurisdiction under Chapter XIX-A to pass settlement orders beyond disclosed income when supported by credible evidence.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Shri Satya Prakash Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of income tax additions for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18, holding that without incriminating material found during search, no additions can be sustained in completed assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act.
M/S NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd v. Oswal Woolen Mills Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award that a minor delay in commissioning a solar power plant due to force majeure and administrative delays did not justify forfeiture of the Performance Bank Guarantee without proof of legal injury.
Jyoti Chaudhary & Anr. v. Rai Virender Nagpal
The Delhi High Court partly allowed a petition under Article 227 to reduce the cost imposed for setting aside an ex-parte order, considering the petitioners' financial incapacity.
M/S GTL Infrastructure Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to waive costs imposed by the MCD Appellate Tribunal due to counsel's non-appearance caused by a genuine medical emergency.
Virender Kumar Bhardwaj v. Muncipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed MCD to pay costs for belated filing of written statement, emphasizing that delay condonation must be exceptional and unjustified delay attracts costs.
Nirmal Bindal v. Sanjeev Agarwal
The Delhi High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the pending appeal expeditiously, considering the petitioner’s age and health, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Ambience Private Limited & Anr. v. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a bank cannot arbitrarily withdraw a One Time Settlement after full payment by the borrower and emphasized the binding nature of OTS sanction terms and the doctrine of legitimate expectation.
Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against respondent no. 1, holding that non-payment of EMIs and alleged asset disposal were not willful disobedience due to financial inability and ongoing insolvency proceedings.
Captain Deepak Kumar v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s letters patent appeal challenging the dismissal of his writ petition containing unsubstantiated and mala fide allegations, and directed local authorities to monitor his mental health under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
International Management Group (UK) Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, International Taxation, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that income earned by IMG not attributable to its Indian PE is taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK DTAA and Income Tax Act, rejecting IMG's challenge to bifurcation and the 'make available' test.
Kostub Investments Ltd. v. Reinz Talbros Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that claims of secured debenture holders in company liquidation must be adjudicated up to the date of appointment of the provisional liquidator, not the final winding up date, dismissing the petitioner's challenge.
Kamal Singh Alias Kamal Singh Rawat v. Jai Kumar Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that receipt of benefits under the Employees State Insurance Act does not bar a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act for injuries caused by a third party, allowing the appeal and remanding for fresh assessment.