Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Bhawna v. Rambeer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages for loss of earning capacity, adjusting functional disability, and awarding additional non-pecuniary damages including future prospects.
Anil Malhotra v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court set aside the pension reduction order for lack of proper evidence and procedural compliance under Regulation 33, remitting the matter for fresh decision after due process.
Union of India v. 693171-EX WO Om Prakash Yadav
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, relying on established precedents.
Sanjay Kumar Jain & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity and due execution of a registered Will dated 07.06.2005, allowing probate in favor of the petitioners despite objections alleging fraud and lack of testamentary capacity.
Abdur Rahman Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under rash and negligent driving charges based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve ends of justice.
MD Salman Khan Alias Salmansalmani and Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Ankit Jain and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Manjeet Singh v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties.
H.C. Gupta v. M/S J.K. Iron & Steel Mfg. Co.
The Delhi High Court affirmed conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that statutory presumption applies and defence without cogent evidence fails, but modified sentence considering appellant's age and delay.
Gajender Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court acquitted the appellant in a child rape case due to contradictions in victim’s testimony, inconclusive medical evidence, and reliable CCTV footage disproving the prosecution’s case.
Ajay @ Ganga Ram v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a child under the POCSO Act, affirming the statutory presumption and rejecting the appellant's alibi and false implication plea.
Nasir v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the right to liberty and speedy trial under Article 21 despite the seriousness of the offence.
Ankush @ Dal Chand v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in serious sexual offence and domestic violence cases due to prolonged trial delay, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 with conditions to protect the victim and witnesses.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi)
The High Court upheld the dowry death and cruelty convictions against the husband but acquitted the in-laws due to insufficient evidence of dowry-related cruelty soon before the deceased's suicide.
Ranjana Rajagopalan v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that a co-operative housing society member may nominate a single non-blood relative as nominee, reading down Rule 91 and Form 17 to conform with Section 78 of the Act, while upholding blood relation restriction for joint nominations as constitutionally valid.
Ranjana Arora v. Devender Kumar Legal Heirs & Ors.
The court dismissed the petition seeking to file additional documents at the final stage of a long-pending suit due to lack of sufficient cause and to prevent reopening of evidence and delay.
Farhad Suri v. Praveen Choudhary
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act against company directors for cheques dishonoured due to statutory moratorium during insolvency proceedings, holding that such cheques were not validly issued and no offence was made out.
Md. Aniqul Islam v. Directorate of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that summons issued under Section 70 CGST Act for inquiry are valid procedural steps and dismissed writ petitions challenging them as premature.
Anandam Minerals Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the preferred bidder declaration in a mineral block auction, relying on expert reports that found no server-side technical glitch and emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender processes absent mala fide or arbitrariness.
M/S RAMACIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
Appeals against enforcement orders of arbitral awards are maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 only if the orders are enumerated in Order XLIII CPC; otherwise, such appeals are not maintainable and are dismissed.