Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Usha Tyagi; Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Santosh Verma; Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Suman Lata
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided unrecognized schools have the right to appeal before the Delhi School Tribunal under the DSE Act, and termination without following due process is invalid.
Mukesh Kumar v. Neelam
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing an LIC agent husband to pay Rs. 20,000 monthly maintenance to his wife and children under Section 125 CrPC, affirming the court's power to estimate income for interim relief.
Shivi Bansal v. Gaurav Bansal
The Delhi High Court held that a divorce petition cannot be partially rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if any ground such as cruelty is viable, and that an alleged adulterer is neither a necessary nor proper party to the proceedings.
Delhi Jal Board v. M/S Envirotech Overseas India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to set aside the arbitral award, upholding the award on security deposit release and outstanding payments, and allowed enforcement of the award against Delhi Jal Board.
Amit Agrawal and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Prakash Singh Rajpurohit v. M/S OP AND SONS TRADER PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction and cause of action are mixed questions of law and fact not decidable at the plaint rejection stage under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, and upheld the trial court's order refusing to reject the plaint.
Lava Kishore Malhotra v. Nivedita Vermani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint discloses a sufficient cause of action regarding unauthorized construction and that the High Court cannot interfere under Section 115 CPC without jurisdictional error.
Karam Bir v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking rounding off of marks in a remedial examination conducted by AICTE following a Supreme Court order invalidating certain distance learning engineering degrees.
M/S VK TRADERS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, MANDOLI DIVISION, EAST DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a vague and unreasoned GST registration cancellation order for violating natural justice and directed restoration of registration.
NIVA BUPA HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an unreasoned GST tax demand order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, emphasizing statutory limits on extension of limitation periods under Section 168A of the CGST Act.
Mukesh Kumar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust in a land purchase case, citing completed investigation, delay in trial, and no flight risk.
Harish Jindal v. Garima Jindal
The Delhi High Court allowed the father's appeal to vary the family court order permitting him to have weekly WhatsApp video calls with his son, emphasizing child welfare and maintaining parental contact through virtual means.
Dinesh Bhagat v. Residents Welfare Association CA Block
The High Court held that limitation being a mixed question of law and fact cannot be decided at the preliminary stage under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and must be adjudicated at trial.
Atul Punj v. IDBI Bank
The Delhi High Court held that an individual bank cannot unilaterally classify a borrower's account as 'fraud' without consortium consensus and must afford an opportunity of hearing before such classification.
Vinod Yadav & Ors. v. Mamta Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex parte summary suit decree, holding that the petitioners failed to establish special circumstances under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC despite COVID-19 and personal hardships.
Sh Dadaso Jagtap and Anr. v. Smt Satwant Kaur Sarna and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint that introduced a new cause of action and parties, holding such amendment impermissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
T.R. Sawhney Shopping Pvt. Ltd. v. Nagender Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that exclusion of limitation period under Section 14 of the Limitation Act requires prosecution of prior proceedings with due diligence and good faith, and mere wrong legal advice does not justify exclusion, setting aside the Trial Court's order and dismissing the suit as time-barred.
Rajkumar Sukhdevsinhji & Anr. v. IDBI Bank
The Delhi High Court held that banks must provide borrowers an opportunity of hearing and supply forensic audit reports before classifying accounts as fraud, quashing the impugned Show Cause Notices issued without such compliance.
Mangal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim of lawful possession over agricultural land in the Yamuna floodplains, holding their occupation unauthorized and permitting eviction for ecological restoration and public projects.
Chander Bhan v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging DDA's repair of boundary walls on government land in Yamuna floodplains, holding the petitioner lacked title and concealed material facts.