Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sarbjit Singh v. Anil Kumar Dhupar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld fixation of use and occupation charges at Rs. 25,000 per month payable by the tenant post eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, rejecting the tenant's lower rent claim and area dispute.
Meenu Gupta & others v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement by the landlord, recognizing ownership through oral family partition and rejecting the tenant's challenge to landlordship and bona fide need.
Dinesh Mittal & Ors. v. M/S Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Official Liquidator’s authority to sell company land assets in liquidation, rejecting allottees’ claims for allotment and directing government officials to comply with compensation disbursement orders.
Vedpal Sheetal Chaudhary v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed administrative authorities to expeditiously consider representations regarding flawed drainage causing waterlogging, closing the writ petition without adjudicating on merits.
Savalia Rajan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the debarment of a candidate from NEET PG 2024 for serious misrepresentation in NEET PG 2023 application, affirming the Ethics Committee's extended penalty.
Sri Awadh Ram Leela Committee Vashnu Mata Mandir v. Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that there is no fundamental right to insist on organizing Ram Leela on a particular land and that the statutory authorities have fulfilled their duty by allotting available land.
Usha v. Kanta
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery of a friendly loan without fixed repayment time is barred by limitation three years from the date the loan was advanced, not from the date of demand.
Kirti Gupta v. Vinay Kumar Aggarwal & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award, affirming contributory negligence against the appellant for allowing her minor son to drive without a license and confirming the compensation quantum based on assessed functional disability.
Smriti Bhatia v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi High Court directed the MCD to effectively enforce demolition orders against unauthorized construction, emphasizing its statutory duty and the Court's writ jurisdiction to prevent municipal abdication.
Sundari Gautam v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the offences under sections 3 and 5 of the POCSO Act apply to offenders of any gender, dismissed the revision petition challenging framing of charge against a female accused, and ruled that delay in FIR registration does not warrant discharge.
Rahul v. National Insurance Company Ltd.
The Supreme Court restored the Tribunal's 25% disability assessment and enhanced compensation, setting aside the High Court's unjustified reduction to 20%.
Rajkot Municipal Corporation v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing refund of property tax arrears wrongly recovered from a subsequent owner, holding liability arises only from the date of ownership acquisition under the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act.
Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court allowed bail to Manish Sisodia, emphasizing the fundamental right to speedy trial and liberty, and held that prolonged pre-trial incarceration without trial commencement violates constitutional protections despite serious economic offence allegations.
Doli Rani Saha v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that the claimant discharged the burden to prove the deceased was a bona fide passenger who died due to falling from a train, entitling her to enhanced compensation with interest.
Bhagwan Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that unauthorized filing of petitions with forged documents is a serious abuse of process warranting CBI investigation and strict action against involved advocates and parties.
Invest Assets Securitisations & Reconstruction Private Limited v. Bank of Baroda
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an auction sale for non-compliance with Regulation 37(1) of the Debts Recovery Tribunal Regulations, holding that the assignee waived the mandatory procedural requirement by failing to raise timely objections.
Sachin Manohar Khambe v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the State Government’s categorization of a convict serving concurrent life sentences under stricter remission guidelines, ruling that concurrent sentences under Section 427(2) CrPC justify applying the 2010 remission policy requiring 30 years imprisonment including remission.
Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd v. Purnanadu Shekharmal Jain
The Bombay High Court held that the SARFAESI Act provisions override the MPID Act in respect of properties mortgaged prior to attachment, quashing the MPID attachment to uphold the secured creditor’s rights.
Amrapali Sakharam Kamble v. The District Collector
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a No-Confidence motion against a Gram Panchayat Sarpanch, ruling that procedural compliance and the majority’s will must be respected, and dismissed the petitioner’s challenge under Articles 226 and 227.
The Municipal Commissioner Pune Municipal Corporation v. Ms Safia Abdul Salam Shaikh
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Minorities Commission lacks jurisdiction to pass binding orders on employment promotions, quashing its order directing retrospective promotion and benefits.