Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE v. SMT. OMBIRI & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for fatal accident caused by rash and negligent driving, dismissing the insurer's appeal challenging liability and quantum.
Kavita Arora v. Leptons Designtek Pvt Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the NCLT has jurisdiction to adjudicate allegations of forgery in company disputes and remanded the matter for forensic examination and proper adjudication.
Nishant Tandon v. Commissioner, CGST, East Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed tax authorities to provide GST documents physically or electronically to a petitioner denied portal access, allowing appellate remedies without prejudice due to delay.
NUTECH APPLIANCES v. SUPERINTENDENT RANGE-35, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to a vague Show Cause Notice and violation of natural justice, directing restoration of registration.
Amit Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Pawan Garg v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Saleem Khan & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Bagri & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Sh. Balbir v. The State Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Manjeet Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Uzair Khan v. Nike Innovate CV & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal with directions for the appellant to furnish an undertaking against trademark infringement, while ensuring ongoing suit and contempt proceedings continue unaffected.
Saijee Developers (P) Ltd. v. Mr. Inderjeet Khanduja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants access to the suit property for independent valuation, balancing procedural fairness by permitting the plaintiff to respond to new valuation evidence.
Vijay Singh Dogra v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim relief to travel abroad during an ongoing SFIO investigation, holding that travel restrictions are justified to protect the investigation and economic interests despite the petitioner’s fundamental right to travel.
Dr. Kumud Sharma & Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that reimbursement under the ESIC scheme is not available for non-emergency surgeries undertaken without referral from an ESIC hospital.
Nadeem v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of conspiracy and aiding in a murder, considering his limited role, compliance with interim bail, and the trial stage.
M/S BKB TRANSPORT P LIMITED v. NTPC LTD
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under the contract agreements and that pre-arbitration reference to an Expert Settlement Council is optional, allowing the petitioner to proceed with arbitration.
Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience by respondents in proceeding with a sexual harassment inquiry, holding that acting on a bona fide interpretation of court orders precludes contempt.
Anil Kumar Hajelay & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified its earlier order to require comprehensive administrative and financial sanctions and directed the GNCTD to float a comprehensive tender for hybrid courts infrastructure across all 691 courts, rejecting phased tendering limited to pilot courts.
Nandita v. National Testing Agency and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the NEET-UG 2024 answer key, holding that judicial interference is limited to cases where the answer key is demonstrably wrong and upholding the presumption of correctness of expert-verified answer keys.
INSPR (MIN) Vijay Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing notional pay fixation at par with juniors for BSF Assistant Sub Inspectors granted retrospective seniority, limiting arrears due to delay in filing.