Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
E TRAV TECH LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Delhi High Court held that bidders disqualified at the technical stage are entitled to reasons and breakup of marks post-tender completion, but premature challenges without such disclosure are not maintainable.
Rahul Bansal v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a compassionate appointment to Delhi Police based on non-honourable acquittal and antecedent assessment, affirming employer discretion and limited judicial review.
STAR PROPWELL PVT LTD v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that the suit for refund was not barred by limitation as the cause of action crystallized upon clear refusal by the bank and the time spent in bona fide writ proceedings is excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
MADRAS SECURITY PRINTERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SMART GOVERNMENT
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitrary exclusion of a bidder at the pre-qualification stage for a public tender, emphasizing adherence to tender conditions, transparency, and the right to know reasons for disqualification.
Anwar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside gang rape convictions due to materially inconsistent victim testimony and held that DNA evidence alone cannot sustain conviction without reliable corroboration.
Kali Charan & Anr. v. UOI & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for criminal conspiracy and misappropriation of public property based on corroborated approver testimony and documentary evidence, but set aside the conviction for causing disappearance of evidence due to insufficient proof.
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Om Prakash & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused persons due to insufficient reliable evidence proving assault on a public servant beyond reasonable doubt.
XYZ v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that an appeal against a discharge order under Section 376 IPC is not maintainable and the proper remedy is to file a revision petition under Section 397(1) CrPC.
Ritu Butalia v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's application for production and inspection of original foreign documents lacking diplomatic certification to ensure effective cross-examination and a fair trial in an Income Tax prosecution.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation for default and non-prosecution due to failure to appear despite repeated calls and warnings.
Sejal Scales v. Axis Bank Limited
The court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, leaving merits and arbitrability to the tribunal.
IGATPURI HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed the operation of a Cure Period Notice issued under a highway concession agreement pending arbitration, emphasizing preservation of contractual rights and the sanctity of arbitration proceedings.
ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. TP LINK TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed an enhanced interim security deposit based on admitted sales figures in a Wi-Fi 6 SEP infringement suit, rejecting claims of misrepresentation without trial.
Bennett, Coleman and Company Limited v. E Entertainment Television LLC and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that cross-examination in trademark rectification proceedings is discretionary and not a matter of right, dismissing the petitioner's applications for cross-examination due to lack of justifiable grounds.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SHASHI NATHANI DEOLI (KAVITA) & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld negligence based on criminal conviction and revised the compensation award in a motor accident claim in line with Supreme Court standards, allowing the appeal partly.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Rajwati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award including disability and pain and suffering, affirming insurer's initial liability under the pay and recover principle despite the vehicle plying without a valid permit.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Raj Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the claimant's entitlement to compensation for injuries from a motor accident caused by the offending vehicle's rash driving, rejected contributory negligence, and enhanced the award based on proper assessment of disability and income.
Dimpy Nangia v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ravinder Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a complaint under Section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed defenses of forgery and fabrication must be proved at trial where signatures on the cheque are not disputed.
Ritu Gupta v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act and Section 420 IPC against guarantors where security cheques were presented without prior demand, beyond six months validity, and in absence of established loan default.
Subhash C. Sahni v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed complaints under Section 138 NI Act against a non-resident director, holding that cheques issued without board-approved liability do not attract criminal liability under the NI Act.