Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Pawan Kumar Ahluwalia & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a second FIR alleging criminal breach of trust and misappropriation, holding that it disclosed distinct offences beyond the GST Act and warranted investigation.
Shelly Narang v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The High Court upheld summons against a company director under Section 138 NI Act, holding that mere denial without unimpeachable evidence is insufficient to quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
Seema Devi v. Suresh Kumar
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by raising a probable defense on the preponderance of probabilities.
XXX v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The High Court dismissed the complainant's direct appeal against acquittal by the Magistrate on maintainability grounds, directing the appeal to be filed before the Sessions Court.
M/S SUPER CIRCLE AUTO LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DELHI AND ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing release of MEIS rewards to the exporter despite inadvertent procedural errors in shipping bills, relying on Supreme Court precedent affirming entitlement where intention to claim is clear.
M/S TDI Infrastructure Limited v. Supreet Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.
Sh Surender Singh v. Smt Shashi Bala Shukla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to restore a suit dismissed-in-default due to non-appearance caused by a court strike and ill-health, emphasizing timely restoration applications under Order IX Rule 9 CPC.
Santosh & Ors. v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord through execution, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Sushila & Ors. v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition challenging eviction becomes infructuous once possession is restored to the landlord through execution proceedings, limiting the scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Om Prakash & Anr. v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition challenging an eviction order becomes infructuous once possession is legally restored to the landlord through execution proceedings, limiting the scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Maya & Ors. v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging eviction as infructuous since possession had been lawfully restored to the landlord through execution proceedings, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Dinesh v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a tenant's revision petition challenging eviction as infructuous after possession was lawfully restored to the landlord through execution proceedings, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Chajju Ram & Anr v. Sunil Yadav & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a tenant's revision petition challenging eviction after possession was restored to the landlord, holding such petitions infructuous and emphasizing the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Rakesh & Ors. v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition challenging eviction becomes infructuous once possession is lawfully restored to the landlord through execution proceedings, limiting the scope of revision under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Sher Singh v. Sunil Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a tenant’s revision petition challenging eviction as infructuous after possession was legally restored to the landlord through execution proceedings, reaffirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Paramjit Singh v. Gagan Singh @ Mannu
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim of joint ownership under the Benami Act for lack of documentary evidence, ordered possession to the rightful legal heir, and awarded mesne profits for unauthorized occupation.
S. C. Gupta v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that informer rewards under government schemes are discretionary ex-gratia payments and not enforceable rights, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for full reward and denying entitlement to a personal hearing.
Pravesh Narula Trading as M/s. Capital Enterprises v. Raj Kumar Jain Trading as M/s. Bholaram Puranmall and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to include subsequent trademark registration during trial, permitting relief for trademark infringement alongside passing off to avoid multiplicity of litigation.
M/S INNOVATIVE FACILITY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS PVT LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining termination of a service agreement by enforcing a negative covenant to maintain status quo during arbitration proceedings under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.
Kapil Khanna v. Continental India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the architect's appeal for recovery of unpaid consultancy fees, holding that failure to complete contractual deliverables disentitles payment beyond completed stages.