Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Maj Gen Jitendra Kumar Shukla VSM v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's delayed and erroneous order, restoring the petition for fresh adjudication expeditiously.
Barun Kumar & Ors. v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Sashastra Seema Bal to consider the petitioners' claim for promotion to Commandant (GD) in accordance with the Recruitment Rules and communicate its decision within four weeks.
Maj. Anish Murlidhar v. Dhanuli Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order condoning a shortfall in qualifying service for second service pension under DSC, ruling that statutory pension regulations override Ministry of Defence policy letters prohibiting such condonation.
Rahul Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that rejection of extension requests for joining duty must be by a reasoned order and not solely on the lapse of a fixed period, directing respondents to reconsider the petitioner's representation accordingly.
SBI General Insurance Co Ltd v. Munni Devi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the Insurance Company liable to pay revised compensation based on Delhi minimum wages for permanent injury, excluding death-related damages, and upheld 9% interest in a motor accident claim.
Rajesh Kumar Bhalla v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
The court held that acceptance of voluntary retirement under a VRS Scheme bars claims for past stagnation increments as the scheme constitutes full and final settlement of all claims.
Rajbir Singh v. National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability and non-pecuniary damages in a motor accident claim, recognizing loss of future earning capacity despite no immediate salary loss.
Dinesh Kumar v. Krishan Lal Khurana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an eviction petition filed by some co-owners is maintainable without unanimous consent of all co-owners unless opposition is demonstrated, dismissing the tenant's challenge to the eviction suit.
G.P. Soti v. The Principal Deen Dayal Upadhyay College and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that under the MACP Scheme, financial upgradation must be to the immediate next higher Grade Pay, and Grade Pay Rs.5400/- in PB-2 and PB-3 are distinct, dismissing the petitioner's claim for higher Grade Pay Rs.6600/-.
Edwin D Souza v. Ran Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition by a third party challenging a criminal revision order, holding that only parties or recognized victims have locus standi to challenge criminal proceedings.
Edwin Dsouza v. Ran Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a victim does not have a right to be impleaded as a party in criminal proceedings and upheld the dismissal of the petitioner’s application for impleadment in a property-related criminal revision petition.
M/S ADEP CLINICAL RESERARCH AND DIAGNOSTIC v. M/S SHYAMBHAVI LABS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the invocation notice need only set out the gist of disputes and that proper parties can be joined by amendment.
Pawan Kumar Jaggi v. ACIT Central Circle-25 New Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing reassessment of unexplained foreign bank deposits subject to production of bank statements, affirming that additions can be estimated in absence of evidence but must allow opportunity for verification.
COSLIGHT INFRA COMPANY PVT. LTD v. CONCEPT ENGINEERS
The Delhi High Court held that an order rejecting impleadment of a party in arbitration is a procedural order, not an interim award, and thus not challengeable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Harijinder Kaur and Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a compensation claim under the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme filed within three years of the offence date is not time barred even if the accident report is untraced and the trial has not concluded.
Jones Lang Lasalle Property Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajasthan Urban Drinking Water Sewerage and Infrastructure Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to timely appoint its arbitrator as per the contract's arbitration clause.
Jones Lang Lasalle Property Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajasthan Urban Drinking Water Sewerage and Infrastructure Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to timely appoint its arbitrator as per the contract.
Soumita Construction Private Limited v. Indiabulls Distribution Services Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award passed by a unilaterally appointed arbitrator and appointed a new arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes afresh.
Reena Devi v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a missing person admitted to government hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic may be presumed dead, denied State liability for disappearance absent negligence, and granted humanitarian relief including ex-gratia compensation and contractual employment to the petitioner.
Abhishek Jain & Anr v. Sachin Jain
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging forgery of rent receipts used in civil proceedings, holding that the final civil court finding and Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. bar such prosecution.